Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A. J.

Clinical Cancer Research, Vol 1, Issue 8 881-888, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Flow cytometric DNA analysis of breast cancers with predominance of carcinoma in situ: a comparison of the premalignant and malignant components

GL Ottesen, IJ Christensen, JK Larsen, B Hansen and AJ Andersen
Institute of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen o, Denmark.

Flow cytometric DNA analysis was performed on unfixed frozen tissue samples from 48 cases of invasive breast cancer (IC) with a predominance of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In 15 cases the samples contained only the DCIS component, in 17 cases only the IC component, whereas in 16 cases separate samples from the DCIS as well as the IC part within the individual lesion were available. In the latter 16 cases, complete or partial accordance in DNA ploidy between DCIS and IC was found in 12 cases, whereas no correspondence could be demonstrated in the remaining 4 cases, possibly due to intratumoral DNA heterogeneity. Comparison of the DNA index distribution in samples of DCIS and IC from the 48 cases showed concordant results except for the DNA hyperdiploid subclass, in which 6 clones were found in the DCIS portion compared to 18 clones in the IC portion. S-phase fractions were also comparable in the two groups. A comparison of the DCIS component from the present series of breast cancers to our previous series of pure DCIS also showed similar results with respect to the DNA index distribution, DNA heterogeneity, and S-phase fraction. No differences could be demonstrated between DCIS with and without invasion. The results indicate that the DNA ploidy pattern of breast cancer, as detected by flow cytometric DNA analysis, is established at the preinvasive stage of carcinogenesis.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.