Clinical Cancer Research Joint Metastasis Research Society-AACR Conference on Metastasis Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mescher, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mescher, M. F.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 76-83, January 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Phase I Trial of Large Multivalent Immunogen Derived from Melanoma Lysates in Patients with Disseminated Melanoma

Malcolm S. Mitchell1, June Kan-Mitchell1, Philip R. Morrow12, Denise Darrah1, Vicky E. Jones1 and Matthew F. Mescher3

1Center for Biological Therapy and Melanoma Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California;

>2 Lidak (now Avanir) Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California; and 3Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to determine the toxicity and immunological activity of large multivalent immunogen (LMI), a preparation of tumor cell membranes affixed to amorphous silica microbeads, in patients with melanoma.

Experimental Design: Nineteen patients with metastatic (stage IV) melanoma were entered into the study, of whom 15 received the full 3 months of treatment with LMI. LMI was administered without adjuvant, one-half intradermally (i.d.) and the other half s.c. Because we expected little toxicity, we first treated 2 patients at each dose level, 10-, 30-, or 100-million tumor cell equivalents on weeks 0, 4, and 8, and subsequently randomized the remaining 13 patients to receive treatment with one of those dosage schedules, for a total of 19 patients. Two patients who were registered were found to be ineligible because of brain metastases, and 2 others did not complete the course of treatment for reasons other than toxicity. Thus, 15 patients were fully evaluable. Patients with evidence of a clinical response (at least stable disease at the 12-week checkpoint) had the option of continuing treatment at 4-week intervals. Frequencies of cytolytic T cell precursors against HLA-A2 matched melanoma cells, and delayed-type hypersensitivity to a melanoma cell membrane preparation from a component melanoma cell line were performed to measure immunological efficacy, and serum chemistries and complete blood counts were performed every 2 weeks throughout the study to measure possible toxicity. Computed tomography scans were performed pretreatment and at week 12 to measure possible beneficial effects on known lesions.

Results: Eight of the 15 evaluable patients had an increase in cytolytic T-cell precursors during the course of therapy, usually by day 42. No patient had demonstrable delayed-type hypersensitivity to a melanoma membrane preparation before or after treatment. No toxicity of any kind was observed. A degree of clinical effectiveness of LMI was suggested by the elicitation of stable disease in 5 patients at 12 weeks. One patient had >50% regression of a lung nodule but progression of disease to the brain, whereas a second patient had a bona fide partial remission of a 3-cm diameter solitary lung nodule.

Conclusions: LMI was nontoxic, improved immunological reactivity to melanoma cells, and showed evidence of clinical effectiveness (shrinkage of tumor) in 1 patient. Additional studies with LMI with added adjuvant materials, in melanoma and other cancers, appear warranted.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Caserta, P. Alessi, J. Guarnerio, V. Basso, and A. Mondino
Synthetic CD4+ T Cell-Targeted Antigen-Presenting Cells Elicit Protective Antitumor Responses
Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 3010 - 3018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. D. Pavelko, K. L. Heckman, M. J. Hansen, and L. R. Pease
An Effective Vaccine Strategy Protective against Antigenically Distinct Tumor Variants
Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2471 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.