
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University (CWRU), School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio;2 Developmental Therapeutics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland and CWRU, Cleveland, Ohio;3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CWRU, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio;4 General Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland and CWRU School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio;5 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;6 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and7 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CWRU, Cleveland, Ohio
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to review and determine the cardiovascular safety profile of combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) in a Phase I study in 25 patients with advanced solid tumors.
Experimental Design: CA4P was administered in a dose-escalating fashion starting at 18 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days, and the maximal dosage was 90 mg/m2. Continuous evaluation included bedside blood pressure and pulse monitoring, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at fixed time points for measured QT interval determination, determination of the corrected QT interval (QTc) using Bazetts formula QTc = QT/(R-R interval)1/2, and chart review. Pharmacodynamic correlations of CA4P dose, CA4P/CA4 area under the curve, and Cmax versus heart rate (HR), blood pressure, QT, and QTc intervals, over the first 4 h postdosing were analyzed.
Results: After CA4P administration, there were significant increases in QTc interval at the 3-h and 4-h time points [27.2 ms (P < 0.0001) and 30.8 ms (P < 0.0001), respectively] and HR at the 3- and 4-h time points [13.2 beats per minute (bpm; P < 0.01) and 15.1 bpm (P < 0.001), respectively]. Three of 25 patients had prolonged QTc intervals at baseline, whereas 15 (60%) of 25 and 18 (75%) of 24 patients had prolonged QTc intervals at 3 and 4 h. The slope of HR and QTc increasing as a function of time during the first 4 h was correlated to dose (in milligrams) of CA4P (P = 0.01 and r = 0.49 for HR, P = 0.005 and r = 0.55 for QTc) and to CA4 area under the curve (P = 0.04 and r = 0.41 for HR, P = 0.02 and r = 0.44 for QTc); blood pressure and uncorrected QTc interval dose-response correlations were not significant. Two patients had ECG changes consistent with an acute coronary syndrome within 24 h of CA4P infusion.
Conclusions: CA4P prolongs the QTc interval. There was a temporal relationship with the CA4P infusion and with ECG changes consistent with an acute coronary syndrome in two patients. It is advisable that future trials with CA4P have eligibility guidelines limiting patients with known coronary artery disease or those with multiple coronary artery disease risk factors until more experience is gained regarding potential cardiovascular toxicity with this agent.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Saad, R. Beto, J. Abraham, and S. C. Remick Cardiovascular Safety and Toxicity Profile of New Molecularly Targeted Anticancer Agents ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gould, F. R. Westwood, J. O. Curwen, S. E. Ashton, D. W. Roberts, S. C. Lovick, and A. J. Ryan Effect of Pretreatment With Atenolol and Nifedipine on ZD6126-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Rats J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1724 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Strevel, D. J. Ing, and L. L. Siu Molecularly Targeted Oncology Therapeutics and Prolongation of the QT Interval J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3362 - 3371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. van Heeckeren, S. Bhakta, J. Ortiz, J. Duerk, M. M. Cooney, A. Dowlati, K. McCrae, and S. C. Remick Promise of New Vascular-Disrupting Agents Balanced With Cardiac Toxicity: Is It Time for Oncologists to Get to Know Their Cardiologists? J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1485 - 1488. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Beerepoot, S. A. Radema, E. O. Witteveen, T. Thomas, C. Wheeler, S. Kempin, and E. E. Voest Phase I Clinical Evaluation of Weekly Administration of the Novel Vascular-Targeting Agent, ZD6126, in Patients With Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1491 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. McKeage, P. Fong, M. Jeffery, B. C. Baguley, P. Kestell, M. Ravic, and M. B. Jameson 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic Acid in the treatment of refractory tumors: a phase I safety study of a vascular disrupting agent. Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1776 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Varterasian, H. Fingert, M. Agin, M. Meyer, M. Cooney, T. Radivoyevitch, A. Dowlati, B. Overmoyer, N. Levitan, K. Robertson, et al. Consideration of QT/QTc Interval Data in a Phase I Study in Patients with Advanced Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5967 - 5969. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |