This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evelhoch, J. L. Articles by Waterton, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Evelhoch, J. L. Articles by Waterton, J. C.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of the Response of Murine and Human Tumors to the Vascular-Targeting Agent ZD6126

¹ Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Harper Hospital MR Center, Detroit, Michigan; ² AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware; ³ AstraZeneca Waltham, Massachusetts; and ⁴ Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

Purpose: ZD6126 is a novel vascular targeting agent currently undergoing clinical evaluation. It acts by destabilizing the microtubulin of fragile and proliferating neoendothelial cells in tumors. The drug leads to blood vessel congestion, the selective destruction of the vasculature, and extensive necrosis in experimental tumors. The aim of the study reported here was to assess the ability of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the antivascular effects of ZD6126 in tumors.

Experimental Design: The work was carried out in mice bearing C38 colon adenocarcinoma and in patients with advanced cancers. MRI was performed before and 6 h (human tumors) or 24 h (C38 tumors) after i.v. drug administration. Contrast agent (gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate) enhancement was characterized by the initial area under the gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate uptake versus time curve (IAUC). IAUC reflects blood flow, vascular permeability, and the fraction of interstitial space.

Results: The median IAUC was reduced in all C38 tumors after ZD6126 administration [by 6–48% at 50 mg/kg (n = 3)], 58–91% at 100 mg/kg (n = 4), and 11–93% at 200 mg/kg (n = 6). In contrast, the administration of vehicle only led to no consistent change in median IAUC (n = 4). The ZD6126-induced changes in median IAUC appeared to be dose dependent (P = 0.045). No ZD6126-induced changes were apparent in murine muscle. Similar effects were seen in preliminary data from human tumors (11 tumors studied, 9 patients). At doses of 80 mg/m² and higher, the median IAUC post-ZD6126 treatment was reduced in all of the tumors studied (8 tumors, 6 patients) to 36–72% from the baseline value. There was a significant trend of increasing reductions with increasing exposure (P < 0.01). No drug-induced changes in human muscle or spleen IAUC were apparent. The reproducibility of the median IAUC parameter was investigated in patients. In 19 human tumors (measured in 19 patients) inter- and intratumor coefficients of variation were 64 and 18%.

Conclusions: The contrast enhanced-MRI measured median IAUC is a useful end point for quantifying ZD6126 antivascular effects in human tumors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Gould, F. R. Westwood, J. O. Curwen, S. E. Ashton, D. W. Roberts, S. C. Lovick, and A. J. Ryan Effect of Pretreatment With Atenolol and Nifedipine on ZD6126-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Rats J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1724 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Jackson, J. P.B. O'Connor, G. J.M. Parker, and G. C. Jayson Imaging Tumor Vascular Heterogeneity and Angiogenesis using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3449 - 3459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Horsman and D. W. Siemann Pathophysiologic Effects of Vascular-Targeting Agents and the Implications for Combination with Conventional Therapies Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11520 - 11539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Workman, E. O. Aboagye, Y.-L. Chung, J. R. Griffiths, R. Hart, M. O. Leach, R. J. Maxwell, P. M. J. McSheehy, P. M. Price, and J. Zweit Minimally invasive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic technologies in hypothesis-testing clinical trials of innovative therapies. J Natl Cancer Inst, May 3, 2006; 98(9): 580 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. van Heeckeren, S. Bhakta, J. Ortiz, J. Duerk, M. M. Cooney, A. Dowlati, K. McCrae, and S. C. Remick Promise of New Vascular-Disrupting Agents Balanced With Cardiac Toxicity: Is It Time for Oncologists to Get to Know Their Cardiologists? J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1485 - 1488. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. V. Beerepoot, S. A. Radema, E. O. Witteveen, T. Thomas, C. Wheeler, S. Kempin, and E. E. Voest Phase I Clinical Evaluation of Weekly Administration of the Novel Vascular-Targeting Agent, ZD6126, in Patients With Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1491 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Yankeelov, K. J. Niermann, J. Huamani, D. W. Kim, C. C. Quarles, A. C. Fleischer, D. E. Hallahan, R. R. Price, and J. C. Gore Correlation Between Estimates of Tumor Perfusion From Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 487 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Liu, H. S. Rugo, G. Wilding, T. M. McShane, J. L. Evelhoch, C. Ng, E. Jackson, F. Kelcz, B. M. Yeh, F. T. Lee Jr, et al. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging As a Pharmacodynamic Measure of Response After Acute Dosing of AG-013736, an Oral Angiogenesis Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Results From a Phase I Study J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5464 - 5473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Herbst, A. Onn, and A. Sandler Angiogenesis and Lung Cancer: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3243 - 3256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Miller, J. M. Trigo, C. Wheeler, A. Barge, J. Rowbottom, G. Sledge, and J. Baselga A Multicenter Phase II Trial of ZD6474, a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3369 - 3376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]