Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Averbuch, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Averbuch, S.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 4607-4613, July 15, 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Perspective

Development of the Novel Biologically Targeted Anticancer Agent Gefitinib

Determining the Optimum Dose for Clinical Efficacy

Michael Wolf1, Helen Swaisland2 and Steven Averbuch1

1 Clinical Research, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware, and 2 AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

The emergence of novel, biologically targeted anticancer agents such as gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) has raised the question of how the dose for later-stage clinical development and clinical use is best determined. For cytotoxic drugs, because toxic effects and antitumor activity often fall within the same dose range and are dose dependent, the clinically used dose will depend on the therapeutic window. Therefore, the maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase I trials is typically used to determine the dose level for Phase II and III trials. However, because biologically targeted agents are expected to provide clinical benefits that are not predicted by surrogate end points of toxicity to normal replicating tissue, new Phase I trials have been designed to determine the optimum biological dose for use in further studies.

A large, multifaceted Phase I program was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and targeted biological activity of a once-daily oral dose of gefitinib. The maximum tolerated dose was ≥700 mg/day, although doses as low as 150 mg/day provided (a) plasma concentrations sufficient for pharmacological activity, (b) evidence of targeted biological effect, and (c) antitumor activity. From these observations, two large Phase II trials (‘Iressa’ Dose Evuluation in Advanced Lung Cancer 1 and 2) evaluated 250- and 500-mg/day doses of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As predicted from the Phase I trials, doses >250 mg/day provided no additional efficacy benefit, whereas adverse effects increased in a dose-dependent manner. Consequently, the recommended dose of gefitinib in NSCLC is 250 mg/day. The early clinical trial development of gefitinib provides a model for the development of novel, noncytotoxic anticancer agents.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
Xian Zhou, Suyu Liu, E. S Kim, R. S Herbst, and J J. Lee
Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer -- a step toward personalized medicine
Clinical Trials, June 1, 2008; 5(3): 181 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. R. Luo, Z. Yang, A. Camuso, R. Smykla, K. McGlinchey, K. Fager, C. Flefleh, S. Castaneda, I. Inigo, D. Kan, et al.
Dasatinib (BMS-354825) Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers in Animal Models Predict Optimal Clinical Exposure
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 7180 - 7186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Robert, G. Blumenschein, R. S. Herbst, F. V. Fossella, J. Tseng, M. N. Saleh, and M. Needle
Phase I/IIa Study of Cetuximab With Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9089 - 9096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
C Festuccia, P Muzi, D Millimaggi, L Biordi, G L Gravina, S Speca, A Angelucci, V Dolo, C Vicentini, and M Bologna
Molecular aspects of gefitinib antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in PTEN-positive and PTEN-negative prostate cancer cell lines
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 983 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Gasparini, R. Sarmiento, S. Amici, R. Longo, D. Gattuso, M. Zancan, and M. Gion
Gefitinib (ZD1839) combined with weekly epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study with biological correlate
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2005; 16(12): 1867 - 1873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. C. Daw, W. L. Furman, C. F. Stewart, L. C. Iacono, M. Krailo, M. L. Bernstein, J. E. Dancey, R. A. Speights, S. M. Blaney, J. M. Croop, et al.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Gefitinib in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 23(25): 6172 - 6180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. McKillop, E. A. Partridge, J. V. Kemp, M. P. Spence, J. Kendrew, S. Barnett, P. G. Wood, P. B. Giles, A. B. Patterson, F. Bichat, et al.
Tumor penetration of gefitinib (Iressa), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2005; 4(4): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
J. M. Yingling and S. Glatt
Impact of PK/PD Evaluation of Targeted Therapies on Early Drug Discovery and Clinical Development
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2005; 2005(1): 227 - 230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. J. Fabian and B. F. Kimler
Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators for Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1644 - 1655.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.