Clinical Cancer Research Targets Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Openshaw, H.
Right arrow Articles by Somlo, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Openshaw, H.
Right arrow Articles by Somlo, G.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 461-467, January 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Clinical Trials

Neurophysiological Study of Peripheral Neuropathy after High-Dose Paclitaxel

Lack of Neuroprotective Effect of Amifostine

Harry Openshaw1, Karen Beamon1, Timothy W. Synold2, Jeff Longmate3, Neal E. Slatkin1, James H. Doroshow2, Stephen Forman2, Kim Margolin2, Robert Morgan2, Stephen Shibata2 and George Somlo2

1 Department of Neurology, 2 Division of Medical Oncology, and 3 Division of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California

Purpose: To determine if there is a beneficial effect of amifostine in preventing or reducing the neuropathy induced by high-dose paclitaxel.

Methods: Breast cancer patients receiving high-dose infusional paclitaxel (725 mg/m2/24 h) in combination with doxorubicin (165 mg/m2/96 h) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg/2 h; ACT) were studied on two autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant protocols, one with and one without amifostine (740 mg/m2 administered over 10 min before and 12 h after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion). Patients were evaluated before ACT and 20–40 days later with neurological examination, a composite peripheral neuropathy score, peroneal and sural nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing.

Results: There was no significant difference in paclitaxel maximum concentration, systemic clearance, or area under the curve determinations. Narcotic requirement as well as recovery of hematopoietic counts were also similar in subjects with or without amifostine. After ACT was administered, there was a decrease in peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude and sural nerve sensory action potential amplitude, as well as an increase in vibratory and cold detection thresholds. Clinical composite peripheral neuropathy scores were similar despite amifostine treatment; and logarithm to the base 2 ratios post/pre ACT showed no significant effect of amifostine on peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, sural nerve sensory action potential, vibratory detection thresholds, or cold detection thresholds. All subjects had acroparesthesias and lost their ankle deep-tendon reflexes after administration of ACT.

Conclusions: Single high-dose paclitaxel produces predictable clinical and neurophysiological changes so that patients receiving high-dose therapy are ideal subjects to test the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents. Amifostine was ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxicity of high-dose paclitaxel.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-M. Wang, L.-X. Hu, Z.-M. Liu, X.-F. You, S.-H. Zhang, J.-R. Qu, Z.-R. Li, Y. Li, W.-J. Kong, H.-W. He, et al.
N-(2,6-Dimethoxypyridine-3-yl)-9-Methylcarbazole-3-Sulfonamide as a Novel Tubulin Ligand against Human Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 6218 - 6227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain
Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1633 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. E. Broker, F. Y.F.L. de Vos, C. J. van Groeningen, B. C. Kuenen, H. E. Gall, M. H. Woo, M. Voi, J. A. Gietema, E. G.E. de Vries, and G. Giaccone
Phase I Trial with BMS-275183, a Novel Oral Taxane with Promising Antitumor Activity.
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1760 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
K. I. Block and C. Gyllenhaal
Commentary: The Pharmacological Antioxidant Amifostine--Implications of Recent Research for Integrative Cancer Care
Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2005; 4(4): 329 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Mielke, A. Sparreboom, S. M. Steinberg, H. Gelderblom, C. Unger, D. Behringer, and K. Mross
Association of Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics with the Development of Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4843 - 4850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. van den Bent
Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Leukemia Inhibitory Factor
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1691 - 1693.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
I. D. Davis, L. Kiers, L. MacGregor, M. Quinn, J. Arezzo, M. Green, M. Rosenthal, M. Chia, M. Michael, P. Bartley, et al.
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Recombinant Human Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (rhuLIF, Emfilermin, AM424) to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1890 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Cordes and V Meineke
Modification of the cellular radiation survival and proliferation response by cell-matrix interactions: implications for integrin targeting in therapeutic approaches for radiation accident patients
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; Supplement_27(1): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.