
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
1 Department of Neurology, 2 Division of Medical Oncology, and 3 Division of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
Purpose: To determine if there is a beneficial effect of amifostine in preventing or reducing the neuropathy induced by high-dose paclitaxel.
Methods: Breast cancer patients receiving high-dose infusional paclitaxel (725 mg/m2/24 h) in combination with doxorubicin (165 mg/m2/96 h) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg/2 h; ACT) were studied on two autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant protocols, one with and one without amifostine (740 mg/m2 administered over 10 min before and 12 h after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion). Patients were evaluated before ACT and 2040 days later with neurological examination, a composite peripheral neuropathy score, peroneal and sural nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing.
Results: There was no significant difference in paclitaxel maximum concentration, systemic clearance, or area under the curve determinations. Narcotic requirement as well as recovery of hematopoietic counts were also similar in subjects with or without amifostine. After ACT was administered, there was a decrease in peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude and sural nerve sensory action potential amplitude, as well as an increase in vibratory and cold detection thresholds. Clinical composite peripheral neuropathy scores were similar despite amifostine treatment; and logarithm to the base 2 ratios post/pre ACT showed no significant effect of amifostine on peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, sural nerve sensory action potential, vibratory detection thresholds, or cold detection thresholds. All subjects had acroparesthesias and lost their ankle deep-tendon reflexes after administration of ACT.
Conclusions: Single high-dose paclitaxel produces predictable clinical and neurophysiological changes so that patients receiving high-dose therapy are ideal subjects to test the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents. Amifostine was ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxicity of high-dose paclitaxel.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Microtubule-Stabilizing Agents J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1633 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Broker, F. Y.F.L. de Vos, C. J. van Groeningen, B. C. Kuenen, H. E. Gall, M. H. Woo, M. Voi, J. A. Gietema, E. G.E. de Vries, and G. Giaccone Phase I Trial with BMS-275183, a Novel Oral Taxane with Promising Antitumor Activity. Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1760 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. I. Block and C. Gyllenhaal Commentary: The Pharmacological Antioxidant Amifostine--Implications of Recent Research for Integrative Cancer Care Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2005; 4(4): 329 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mielke, A. Sparreboom, S. M. Steinberg, H. Gelderblom, C. Unger, D. Behringer, and K. Mross Association of Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics with the Development of Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Advanced Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4843 - 4850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. van den Bent Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1691 - 1693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. D. Davis, L. Kiers, L. MacGregor, M. Quinn, J. Arezzo, M. Green, M. Rosenthal, M. Chia, M. Michael, P. Bartley, et al. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Recombinant Human Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (rhuLIF, Emfilermin, AM424) to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1890 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Cordes and V Meineke Modification of the cellular radiation survival and proliferation response by cell-matrix interactions: implications for integrin targeting in therapeutic approaches for radiation accident patients Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; Supplement_27(1): 152 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |