
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
Departments of 1 Urology, 2 Clinical Pathology, and 3 Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; 4 Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; 5 James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and 6 Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Purpose: There is increasing evidence for a fundamental role for epigenetic silencing of apoptotic pathways in cancer. Changes in DNA methylation can be detected with a high degree of sensitivity, so we used the MethyLight assay to determine how methylation patterns of apoptosis-associated genes change during bladder carcinogenesis and whether DNA methylation could be detected in urine sediments.
Experimental Design: We analyzed the methylation status of the 5' regions of 12 apoptosis-associated genes (ARF, FADD, TNFRSF21, BAX, LITAF, DAPK, TMS-1, BCL2, RASSF1A, TERT, TNFRSF25, and EDNRB) in 18 bladder cancer cell lines, 127 bladder cancer samples, and 37 samples of adjacent normal bladder mucosa using the quantitative MethyLight assay. We also analyzed the methylation status in urine sediments of 20 cancer-free volunteers and 37 bladder cancer patients.
Results: The 5' regions of DAPK, BCL2, TERT, RASSFIA, and TNFRSF25 showed significant increases in methylation levels when compared with nonmalignant adjacent tissue (P
0.01). Methylation levels of BCL2 were significantly associated with tumor staging and grading (P
0.01), whereas methylation levels of RASSF1A and ARF were only associated with tumor stage (P
0.04), and TERT methylation and EDNRB methylation were predictors of tumor grade (P
0.02). To investigate clinical usefulness for noninvasive bladder cancer detection, we further analyzed the methylation status of the markers in urine samples of patients with bladder cancer. Methylation of DAPK, BCL2, and TERT in urine sediment DNA from bladder cancer patients was detected in the majority of samples (78%), whereas they were unmethylated in the urine sediment DNA from age-matched cancer-free individuals.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that methylation of the 5' region of apoptosis-associated genes is a common finding in patients with bladder carcinoma. The ability to detect methylation not only in bladder tissue, but also in urine sediments, suggests that methylation markers are promising tools for noninvasive detection of bladder cancers. Our results also indicate that some methylation markers, such as those in regions of RASSF1A and TNFRSF25, might be of limited use for detection because they are also methylated in normal bladder tissues.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Yu, T. Zhu, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Qian, H. Xu, B. Gao, W. Wang, L. Gu, J. Meng, et al. A Novel Set of DNA Methylation Markers in Urine Sediments for Sensitive/Specific Detection of Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7296 - 7304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Yates, I. Rehman, M. F. Abbod, M. Meuth, S. S. Cross, D. A. Linkens, F. C. Hamdy, and J. W.F. Catto Promoter Hypermethylation Identifies Progression Risk in Bladder Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 2046 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jin, E. K. Blue, and P. J. Gallagher Control of Death-associated Protein Kinase (DAPK) Activity by Phosphorylation and Proteasomal Degradation J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39033 - 39040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Mitra, R. H. Datar, and R. J. Cote Molecular Pathways in Invasive Bladder Cancer: New Insights Into Mechanisms, Progression, and Target Identification J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5552 - 5564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J MARSIT, M. R KARAGAS, A. SCHNED, and K. T KELSEY Carcinogen exposure and epigenetic silencing in bladder cancer. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1076: 810 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Knowles Molecular subtypes of bladder cancer: Jekyll and Hyde or chalk and cheese? Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 361 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Marsit, M. R. Karagas, H. Danaee, M. Liu, A. Andrew, A. Schned, H. H. Nelson, and K. T. Kelsey Carcinogen exposure and gene promoter hypermethylation in bladder cancer Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 112 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Marsit, M. R. Karagas, A. Andrew, M. Liu, H. Danaee, A. R. Schned, H. H. Nelson, and K. T. Kelsey Epigenetic Inactivation of SFRP Genes and TP53 Alteration Act Jointly as Markers of Invasive Bladder Cancer Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7081 - 7085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Laird Cancer epigenetics Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(suppl_1): R65 - R76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |