Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Burchill, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Burchill, S. A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 7511-7519, November 15, 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

The Use of Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Prostate-Specific Antigen mRNA to Discriminate between Blood Samples from Healthy Volunteers and from Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Kinnari Patel1, Peter J. Whelan2, Stephen Prescott2, Samantha C. Brownhill1, Colin F. Johnston1, Peter J. Selby1 and Susan A. Burchill1

1 Cancer Research U.K. Clinical Centre and 2 Department of Urology, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Purpose: A clinical role for nonquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using prostate-specific antigen in blood samples from patients with prostate cancer remains undefined. Assay variation and detection of prostate-specific antigen mRNA illegitimate transcription may explain inconsistent results between studies. Defining levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA expression in blood samples from healthy volunteers and patients with prostate cancer would allow cutoffs to be established to distinguish the two groups.

Experimental Design: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR for prostate-specific antigen mRNA was established and levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA measured in bloods samples from healthy volunteers (n = 21) and patients with localized (n = 27) and metastatic (n = 40) prostate cancer.

Results: Levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA were significantly higher in blood samples from patients with metastatic prostate cancer than in blood samples from patients with localized prostate cancer (P < 0.001) or in blood samples from healthy volunteers (P < 0.01); levels between patients with localized prostate cancer and healthy volunteers were no different. Assay sensitivity to detect patients with metastatic prostate cancer was 68% with specificity of 95%. In patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, monitoring response to hormonal therapy was possible with this assay. No correlation between levels of prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels was found, suggesting that prostate-specific antigen mRNA and serum prostate-specific antigen protein levels reflect different features of prostate cancer, i.e., circulating tumor cells and total tumor bulk, respectively.

Conclusions: Quantitative RT-PCR discriminates patients with metastatic prostate cancer from healthy volunteers and patients with localized prostate cancer but cannot discriminate patients with localized prostate cancer from healthy volunteers. A role for quantitative RT-PCR has been identified in the assessment and monitoring of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Liu, M. Jiang, J. Zhao, and H. Ju
Circulating Tumor Cells in Perioperative Esophageal Cancer Patients: Quantitative Assay System and Potential Clinical Utility
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2992 - 2997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. U. Bai, A. Kaseb, S. Tejwani, G. W. Divine, E. R. Barrack, M. Menon, A. B. Pardee, and G. P.-V. Reddy
Identification of prostate cancer mRNA markers by averaged differential expression and their detection in biopsies, blood, and urine
PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2343 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Pagliarulo, D. Hawes, F. H. Brands, S. Groshen, J. Cai, J. P. Stein, G. Lieskovsky, D. G. Skinner, and R. J. Cote
Detection of Occult Lymph Node Metastases in Locally Advanced Node-Negative Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
N. Dandachi, M. Balic, S. Stanzer, M. Halm, M. Resel, T. A. Hinterleitner, H. Samonigg, and T. Bauernhofer
Critical Evaluation of Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Quantitative Detection of Cytokeratin 20 mRNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2005; 7(5): 631 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.