This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freytes, C. O. Articles by Odenheimer, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freytes, C. O. Articles by Odenheimer, D.

Phase I/II Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Effects of Repifermin Administered to Reduce Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

¹ University of Texas Health Science Center, and ² South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas; ³ University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ⁴ Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona; ⁵ University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; and ⁶ Human Genome Sciences, Rockville, Maryland

Purpose: To evaluate the safety of repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) administered before and after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). A preliminary analysis of the ability of keratinocyte growth factor-2 to prevent mucositis was also done.

Experimental Design: Forty-two patients received intravenous repifermin (25 µg/kg or 50 µg/kg) or placebo for 3 days before their auto-HSCT conditioning regimen and for up to 10 days after auto-HSCT. Within each dose level, 14 patients were randomized to repifermin and 7 patients to placebo. Clinical evaluations of mucositis were scheduled before auto-HSCT conditioning regimen, on the day of transplant, and three times per week until mucositis resolved.

Results: In general, the incidence of adverse events was similar for patients treated with repifermin and placebo. No clinically meaningful differences were noted among treatment groups for clinical laboratory variables. Treatment groups experienced similar time to engraftment. The frequency of Grade 2 to 4 mucositis was 100% for patients in the placebo group, 64% for patients in the 25 µg/kg group (P = 0.041 versus placebo), and 50% for patients in the 50 µg/kg group (P = 0.006 versus placebo). Results of other endpoints, including pain on swallowing and use of pain medication specifically for mucositis, suggested a better outcome for patients in the 50 µg/kg group compared with the placebo and 25 µg/kg groups.

Conclusions: Repifermin was well tolerated. Repifermin given before and after auto-HSCT seems to be active in reducing mucositis, but a larger trial will be necessary to determine the efficacy of repifermin with this dose schedule.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M McDonnell and K. L Lenz Palifermin: Role in the Prevention of Chemotherapy- and Radiation-Induced Mucositis Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2007; 41(1): 86 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Berger, D. M. Christensen, P. C. Lowry, O. W. Jones, and A. L. Wiley Medical management of radiation injuries: current approaches Occup. Med., May 1, 2006; 56(3): 162 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]