| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Trials |
1 Albert Einstein College of Medicine,2 Department of Molecular Pharmacology, and3 Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, New York;4 New York University Comprehensive Cancer Center of New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York;5 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey; and6 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks.
Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were premedicated and treated with escalating doses of BMS-247550. Blood sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550.
Results: Twenty-five patients were treated at six dose levels ranging from 7.4 to 59.2 mg/m2. At 50 mg/m2, 4 of 9 patients (44.4%) had dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, abdominal pain/nausea). At 40 mg/m2 (the recommended Phase II dose), 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) had dose-limiting neutropenia. Overall, the most common nonhematological toxicity was fatigue/generalized weakness (grade 3–4 seen in 9.0% of patients), followed by neurosensory deficits manifested as peripheral neuropathy and by gastrointestinal discomfort. At 40 mg/m2, the incidence of grade 3 fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neuropathy was 7.7%. Grade 1–2 neuropathy was observed in all patients enrolled and treated at 40 mg/m2. Two patients with paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer, one patient with taxane-naïve breast cancer, and another patient with docetaxel-refractory breast cancer had objective partial responses (lasting 6.0, 5.3, 3.0, and 4.5 months, respectively). The mean pharmacokinetic parameter values during course 1 for clearance, volume of distribution, and apparent terminal elimination half-life at the 40 mg/m2 (recommended Phase II dose) dose level were 21 liters/h/m2, 826 liters/m2, and 35 h (excluding one outlier of 516 h), respectively. Values during course 1 and course 2 were similar.
Conclusions: The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation of BMS-247550 is 40 mg/m2, although more long-term observations are needed. BMS-247550 has advantages over taxanes in relation to drug resistance and warrants further study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Goel, M. Cohen, S. N. Comezoglu, L. Perrin, F. Andre, D. Jayabalan, L. Iacono, A. Comprelli, V. T. Ly, D. Zhang, et al. The Effect of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ixabepilone: A First in Class Epothilone B Analogue in Late-Phase Clinical Development Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 14(9): 2701 - 2709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Lee and S. M. Swain The Epothilones: Translating from the Laboratory to the Clinic Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1618 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C Sessa, A Perotti, A Llado, S Cresta, G Capri, M Voi, S Marsoni, I Corradino, and L Gianni Phase I clinical study of the novel epothilone B analogue BMS-310705 given on a weekly schedule Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1548 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Thomas, J. Tabernero, M. Fornier, P. Conte, P. Fumoleau, A. Lluch, L. T. Vahdat, C. A. Bunnell, H. A. Burris, P. Viens, et al. Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, in Patients With Taxane-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2007; 25(23): 3399 - 3406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Aghajanian, H. A. Burris III, S. Jones, D. R. Spriggs, M. B. Cohen, R. Peck, P. Sabbatini, M. L. Hensley, F. A. Greco, J. Dupont, et al. Phase I Study of the Novel Epothilone Analog Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Lymphomas J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1082 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cortes and J. Baselga Targeting the Microtubules in Breast Cancer Beyond Taxanes: The Epothilones Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 271 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Mani, H. McDaid, A Grossman, F Muggia, S Goel, T Griffin, D Colevas, S. Horwitz, and M. Egorin Peripheral blood mononuclear and tumor cell pharmacodynamics of the novel epothilone B analogue, ixabepilone Ann. Onc., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Lee, J. A. Low, E. Croarkin, R. Parks, A. W. Berman, N. Mannan, S. M. Steinberg, and S. M. Swain Changes in Neurologic Function Tests May Predict Neurotoxicity Caused by Ixabepilone J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2006; 24(13): 2084 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Rubin, J. Rothermel, F. Tesfaye, T. Chen, M. Hubert, Y.-Y. Ho, C.-H. Hsu, and A. M. Oza Phase I Dose-Finding Study of Weekly Single-Agent Patupilone in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9120 - 9129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. de Jonge and J. Verweij The Epothilone Dilemma J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9048 - 9050. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Escuin, E. R. Kline, and P. Giannakakou Both Microtubule-Stabilizing and Microtubule-Destabilizing Drugs Inhibit Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Accumulation and Activity by Disrupting Microtubule Function Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 65(19): 9021 - 9028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Peterson, C. Tucker, E. Favours, P. J. Cheshire, J. Creech, C. A. Billups, R. Smykla, F. Y.F. Lee, and P. J. Houghton In vivo Evaluation of Ixabepilone (BMS247550), A Novel Epothilone B Derivative, against Pediatric Cancer Models Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 6950 - 6958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Gadgeel, A. Wozniak, R. R. Boinpally, R. Wiegand, L. K. Heilbrun, V. Jain, R. Parchment, D. Colevas, M. B. Cohen, and P. M. LoRusso Phase I Clinical Trial of BMS-247550, A Derivative of Epothilone B, Using Accelerated Titration 2B Design Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 11(17): 6233 - 6239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-P. H. Yang, P. Verdier-Pinard, F. Wang, E. Lippaine-Horvath, L. He, D. Li, G. Hofle, I. Ojima, G. A. Orr, and S. B. Horwitz A highly epothilone B-resistant A549 cell line with mutations in tubulin that confer drug dependence Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2005; 4(6): 987 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Low, S. B. Wedam, J. J. Lee, A. W. Berman, A. Brufsky, S. X. Yang, M. S. Poruchynsky, S. M. Steinberg, N. Mannan, T. Fojo, et al. Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, in Metastatic and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2726 - 2734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Goodin, M. P. Kane, and E. H. Rubin Epothilones: Mechanism of Action and Biologic Activity J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2004; 22(10): 2015 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |
