
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates |
1 Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy, and2 University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
Purpose: To determine the prognostic value of Fas receptor and Fas ligand (FasL) as apoptosis-related biomarkers in the context of chemoresponsiveness in breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy.
Experimental Design: Fas and FasL were investigated by immunohistochemistry in surgical samples collected from 167 stage I-IIa-b BC patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial using epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant setting.
Results: Fas and FasL were significantly associated with tumor stage (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that stage, loss of Fas (relative risk, 8.5 and 9.12; P < 0.0001) and FasL up-regulation (relative risk, 2.38 and 2.88; P = 0.01) were independent prognostic variables influencing both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A Cox analysis using a four-category Fas/FasL phenotype (+/-, +/+, -/+, -/-) as a stratification factor evidenced a highly positive association between Fas/FasL phenotype and the cumulative hazard of relapse and death in the entire series of patients. We also estimated the DFS and OS for different combinations of the pathological-tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and Fas/FasL by using the K sample log-rank exact test demonstrating that significantly shorter DFS and OS were observed in Fas-negative and FasL-positive patients in both stage I-IIa and IIb.
Conclusions: Data presented herein demonstrated that, according to a number of in vitro studies, the prognosis for BC patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy strongly depends on the Fas/FasL status. Therefore, a concomitant altered pattern of Fas/FasL expression seems to configure an aggressive tumor phenotype linked to disease progression.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Sauer, N. Schneiderhan-Marra, C. Kazmaier, K. Hutzel, K. Koretz, R. Muche, R. Kreienberg, T. Joos, and H. Deissler Prediction of Nodal Involvement in Breast Cancer Based on Multiparametric Protein Analyses from Preoperative Core Needle Biopsies of the Primary Lesion Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3345 - 3353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Villa-Morales, J. Santos, E. Perez-Gomez, M. Quintanilla, and J. Fernandez-Piqueras A Role for the Fas/FasL System in Modulating Genetic Susceptibility to T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphomas Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5107 - 5116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bohana-Kashtan and C. I. Civin Profiling Tumor Counterattack: Do Fas Ligand-Containing Microvesicles Reduce Anticancer Immunity? Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 968 - 970. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Donskov, H. von der Maase, N. Marcussen, S. Hamilton-Dutoit, H. H. T. Madsen, J. J. Jensen, and M. Hokland Fas Ligand Expression in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma During Interleukin-2 Based Immunotherapy: No In vivo Effect of Fas Ligand Tumor Counterattack Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 10(23): 7911 - 7916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |