This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, H. S. Articles by Kim, W. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, H. S. Articles by Kim, W. H.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Gastric Carcinoma Has a Distinct Protein Expression Profile in Comparison with Epstein-Barr Virus-Negative Carcinoma

Departments of ¹ Pathology, and ² Surgery, and ³ Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Purpose: EBV has been detected in 2–16% of gastric carcinomas. However, there is little information available about the gene expression profile of EBV-positive gastric carcinomas.

Experimental Design: EBV infection was examined using EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBERs) in situ hybridization, and 63 (5.6%) of 1127 consecutive gastric carcinomas were found to be EBV-positive. The expressions of 27 tumor-associated proteins were evaluated immunohistochemically in 63 EBV-positive gastric carcinomas and 287 EBV-negative carcinomas using the tissue array method. In addition, the genotype of EBV was investigated by PCR amplification of LMP1 (latent membrane protein 1), Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2), and EBNA3B genes.

Results: EBV-positive gastric carcinomas are characterized by the presence of lymphoid stroma, proximal location, and predominance in males. In comparison with EBV-negative carcinomas, EBV-positive carcinomas showed frequent loss of expression of p16, smad4, FHIT, and KAI-1 (kangai 1; P < 0.05), but retained the expression of APC (adenomatous polyposis coli), DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer), and some DNA repair proteins (P < 0.05). There was negative association between EBV infection and the expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, p53, CEA, C-erbB2, and smad7. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, we divided EBV-positive gastric carcinomas into two clusters. Those patients with cluster 1 (42 cases) carcinomas had a better prognosis than those with cluster 2 (12 cases; P = 0.0002) or those with EBV-negative carcinomas (280 cases; P = 0.0251). Fifty-one (92.7%) of 55 EBV-positive carcinomas demonstrated the 30-bp deletion in LMP1 gene, and 53 (96.4%) of 55 cases were type 1 for EBNA2 and EBNA3B genes.

Conclusion: EBV-positive gastric carcinomas have a distinct protein expression profile as well as distinct clinicopathological features, as compared with EBV-negative carcinomas. The subclassification of EBV-positive carcinomas, by hierarchical cluster analysis, is significantly associated with patient survival.