This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Jonge, M. E. Articles by Schellens, J. H. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Jonge, M. E. Articles by Schellens, J. H. M.

Bayesian Pharmacokinetically Guided Dosing of Paclitaxel in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

¹ Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Slotervaart Hospital, and ² Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Paclitaxel is a taxane derivative with a profound antitumor activity against a variety of solid tumors. In a previous clinical study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with paclitaxel, it was shown that paclitaxel plasma concentrations of 0.1 µmol/liter for 15 h were associated with prolonged survival. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of Bayesian dose individualization to attain paclitaxel plasma concentrations >0.1 µmol/liter for 15 h.

Experimental Design: Patients with stage IIIb-IV NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin once every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses. During the first course, a standard paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m² was administered i.v. in 3 h. In subsequent courses, the paclitaxel dose was individualized based on observed paclitaxel concentrations in plasma during the previous course(s) using a Bayesian algorithm. The paclitaxel dose of a subsequent course was increased to the lowest dose for which the predicted time period during which the paclitaxel plasma concentration exceeds 0.1 µmol/liter was >15 h.

Results: A total of 25 patients have been included in the study (92 evaluable courses). During the first course, the median time period above the threshold concentration was 16.3 h (range, 7.6–31.6 h), and was <15 h for 9 patients (36%). During subsequent individualized courses, the time period above the threshold concentration was <15 h in 23% (5 of 22), 14% (2 of 14), 23% (3 of 13), 11% (1 of 9), and 11% (1 of 9) of the patients in the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth course, respectively. Dose increments, ranging from 5 to 65 mg/m², were performed in 29 of the 67 individualized courses. Patients with increased individualized doses had similar regimen related toxicities compared with those remaining at a dose of 175 mg/m². Toxicity was reversible and manageable, and was mainly hematological (granulocytopenia CTC grade 3/4 in 80% of the patients). The objective response rate was 20%.

Conclusions: The results indicate that the applied pharmacokinetically guided dosing strategy for paclitaxel is safe and technically feasible. A randomized study is necessary to demonstrate whether dose individualization may result in improved activity and efficacy in patients with NSCLC.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Johnatty, J. Beesley, J. Paul, S. Fereday, A. B. Spurdle, P. M. Webb, K. Byth, S. Marsh, H. McLeod, AOCS Study Group, et al. ABCB1 (MDR 1) Polymorphisms and Progression-Free Survival among Women with Ovarian Cancer following Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5594 - 5601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G B McDonald and D Frieze A problem-oriented approach to liver disease in oncology patients Gut, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 987 - 1003. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H.J. Mathijssen, F. A. de Jong, W. J. Loos, J. M. van der Bol, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom Flat-Fixed Dosing Versus Body Surface Area Based Dosing of Anticancer Drugs in Adults: Does It Make a Difference? Oncologist, August 1, 2007; 12(8): 913 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaestner and G. Sewell Dose-banding of carboplatin: rationale and proposed banding scheme Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Ekhart, M. E. de Jonge, A. D.R. Huitema, J. H.M. Schellens, S. Rodenhuis, and J. H. Beijnen Flat dosing of Carboplatin is justified in adult patients with normal renal function. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6502 - 6508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Salinger, J. S. McCune, A. G. Ren, D. D. Shen, J. T. Slattery, B. Phillips, G. B. McDonald, and P. Vicini Real-time Dose Adjustment of Cyclophosphamide in a Preparative Regimen for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A Bayesian Pharmacokinetic Approach. Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 12(16): 4888 - 4898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Zheng, R. L. Chang, X.-X. Cui, G. E. Avila, V. Hebbar, M. Garzotto, W. J. Shih, Y. Lin, S.-E. Lu, A. B. Rabson, et al. Effects of 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in Combination with Paclitaxel (Taxol) on Prostate Cancer LNCaP Cells Cultured In vitro or Grown as Xenograft Tumors in Immunodeficient Mice. Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3444 - 3451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Joerger, A. D.R. Huitema, D. H.J.G. van den Bongard, J. H.M. Schellens, and J. H. Beijnen Quantitative effect of gender, age, liver function, and body size on the population pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2150 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]