Clinical Cancer Research Grants Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naume, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nesland, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naume, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nesland, J. M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 10, 3091-3097, May 1, 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Oncology, Markers, Clinical Correlates

The Prognostic Value of Isolated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow in Breast Cancer Patients

Evaluation of Morphological Categories and the Number of Clinically Significant Cells

Bjørn Naume1, Gro Wiedswang4, Elin Borgen2, Gunnar Kvalheim1, Rolf Kåresen4, Hanne Qvist3, Jan Janbu5, Torstein Harbitz6 and Jahn M. Nesland2

Departments of 1 Oncology, 2 Pathology, and 3 Surgery, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 4 Department of Surgery, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 5 Department of Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Oslo Norway; and 6 Department of Surgery, Aker Hospital, Oslo Norway

Purpose/Experimental Design: Immunocytochemical detection of isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the bone marrow (BM) is a prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, hematopoietic cells (HCs) can occasionally be stained by the techniques used. Morphological evaluation improves the specificity of ITC detection, but optimal separation of ITCs from false-positive HCs needs to be determined. Here, predetermined morphological categories of immunocytochemically (ICC)-positive cells in the BM and the number of detected ITCs were analyzed for association with clinical outcome in 817 early-stage breast cancer patients (median 49 months of follow-up). All ICC+ cells detected were categorized into one of the following groups: (a) tumor cell (TC); (b) uninterpretable cell (UIC); (c) probable HC; or (d) HC.

Results: Among the TC+ patients, 30.6% and 25.9% experienced systemic relapse (SR) and breast cancer death (BCD), respectively, as compared with 13.3% and 8.5% of patients without TCs in the BM (survival analyses: P < 0.001, log-rank). The SR and BCD rate was 19.7% and 15.8% for TC–/UIC+ patients versus 12.5% and 7.4% for TC–/UIC– patients. Survival analyses confirmed that the UIC+ group contained clinically significant cells (P = 0.018, log-rank). No difference in clinical outcome was observed, regardless of whether probable HCs or HCs were present. Analyzing the number of ITC+ cells, SR and BCD occurred in 12.4% and 7.4% of patients with 0 ITCs present, 21.3% and 18.5% of patients with 1 ITC present, 19.4% and 16.7% of patients with 2 ITCs present, and 42.5% and 32.5% of patients with >=3 ITCs present.

Conclusions: Morphological categorization of ICC+ cells improves the clinical value of ITC detection in the BM. The presence of only one ITC reduces survival, and a greater number of ITCs further aggravates the prognosis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F.-C. Bidard, A. Vincent-Salomon, S. Gomme, C. Nos, Y. de Rycke, J. P. Thiery, B. Sigal-Zafrani, L. Mignot, X. Sastre-Garau, J.-Y. Pierga, et al.
Disseminated Tumor Cells of Breast Cancer Patients: A Strong Prognostic Factor for Distant and Local Relapse
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3306 - 3311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Vincent-Salomon, F C Bidard, and J Y Pierga
Bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer: review of detection methods, prognostic impact and biological issues
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 570 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Goldhirsch, J. H. Glick, R. D. Gelber, A. S. Coates, B. Thurlimann, H.-J. Senn, and and Panel Members
Meeting Highlights: International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2005
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1569 - 1583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. N. Krag, R. Kusminsky, E. Manna, A. Ambaye, D. L. Weaver, S. P. Harlow, M. Covelli, M. A. Stanley, L. McCahill, F. Ittleman, et al.
The Detection of Isolated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow Comparing Bright-Field Immunocytochemistry and Multicolor Immunofluorescence
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 12(9): 753 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Wiedswang, E. Borgen, R. Karesen, H. Qvist, J. Janbu, G. Kvalheim, J. M. Nesland, and B. Naume
Isolated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow Three Years after Diagnosis in Disease-Free Breast Cancer Patients Predict Unfavorable Clinical Outcome1
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 10(16): 5342 - 5348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.