Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikhitarian, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikhitarian, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitas, M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 3697-3704, May 15, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

An Innovative Microarray Strategy Identities Informative Molecular Markers for the Detection of Micrometastatic Breast Cancer

Kaidi Mikhitarian1, William E. Gillanders1, Jonas S. Almeida2, Renee Hebert Martin2, Juan C. Varela4, John S. Metcalf3, David J. Cole1 and Michael Mitas1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Surgery, 2 Biostatistics Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology and 3 Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 4 College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

Requests for reprints: Kaidi Mikhitarian, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 420, P.O. Box 250613, Charleston, SC 29425. Phone: 843-792-7789; Fax: 843-792-4813; E-mail: mikhitar{at}musc.edu.

There is increasing evidence that molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer in the axillary lymph nodes (ALN) of breast cancer patients can improve staging. Molecular analyses of samples obtained from the Minimally Invasive Molecular Staging of Breast Cancer Trial (n = 489 patients) indicate that whereas the majority of molecular markers are informative for the detection of metastatic breast cancer (significant disease burden), only a few are sensitive for the detection of micrometastatic disease (limited disease burden). Frequency distribution and linear regression analyses reveal that relative levels of gene expression are highly correlated with apparent sensitivity for the detection of micrometastic breast cancer (P < 0.05). These data provides statistical validation of the concept that the most informative markers for detection of micrometastatic disease are those that are most highly expressed in metastatic disease. To test this hypothesis, we developed an innovative microarray strategy. RNA from a metastatic breast cancer ALN was diluted into RNA from a normal lymph node and analyzed using Affymetrix microarrays. Expression analysis indicated that only two genes [mammaglobin (mam) and trefoil factor 1 (TFF1)] were significantly overexpressed at a dilution of 1:50. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of pathology-negative ALN (n = 72) confirm that of all the markers tested, mam and TFF1 have the highest apparent sensitivity for detection of micrometastatic breast cancer. We conclude that a dilutional microarray approach is a simple and reliable method for the identification of informative molecular markers for the detection of micrometastatic cancer.

Key Words: real-time PCR • artificial neural network (ANN) • mammaglobin (mam) • trefoil factor 1 (TFF1)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. Lacroix
Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1033 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Smid, Y. Wang, J. G.M. Klijn, A. M. Sieuwerts, Y. Zhang, D. Atkins, J. W.M. Martens, and J. A. Foekens
Genes Associated With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2006; 24(15): 2261 - 2267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. N. Span, F. C.G.J. Sweep, K. Mikhitarian, W. E. Gillanders, D. J. Cole, M. Mitas, and M. Reinholz
Mammaglobin as Molecular Marker of Breast Cancer (Micro)Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7043 - 7044.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.