Clinical Cancer Research AACR Conference on Cancer Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harigopal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kluger, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harigopal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kluger, H. M.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 4083-4089, June 1, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Automated Quantitative Analysis of E-Cadherin Expression in Lymph Node Metastases Is Predictive of Survival in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer

Malini Harigopal1, Aaron J. Berger1, Robert L. Camp1, David L. Rimm1 and Harriet M. Kluger2

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Pathology and 2 Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Requests for reprints: Harriet M. Kluger, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510. Phone: 203-785-6221; Fax: 203-785-7531; E-mail: Harriet.Kluger{at}yale.edu.

Purpose: The tumor suppressor adhesion molecule E-cadherin is believed to have an anti-invasive role in breast cancer. Lymph node involvement is the best prognostic marker known, yet there is variability in outcome among node-positive patients. We investigated the relationship between E-cadherin expression in primary invasive ductal tumors and corresponding nodal metastases, and determined the prognostic value of E-cadherin expression in node-positive breast cancer.

Experimental Design: Membrane E-cadherin expression was studied by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays with fluorescent-labeled antibodies. An objective method of automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) was used. AQUA uses cytokeratin to define pixels as breast cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot, and measures E-cadherin expression using a Cy5-conjugated antibody within the mask.

Results: We employed a tissue microarray containing 207 primary and matched nodal metastases suitable for AQUA analysis. There was no significant difference in mean staining intensity between the primary and nodal specimens (P = 0.8). A scattergram was generated which identified a subset of patients (25%) with high E-cadherin expression in nodal metastases, and this top quartile had improved survival (P = 0.028). On univariate analysis, increased E-cadherin expression in nodal metastases was strongly associated with improved survival (P = 0.007), whereas expression in primary tumors was not (P = 0.13). On multivariate analysis, nodal E-cadherin expression retained its independent association with survival, as did tumor size and HER2/neu status.

Conclusions: Strong E-cadherin expression in lymph node metastases was highly predictive of improved survival. This suggests that expression of adhesion molecules at metastatic sites portends less aggressive tumor behavior.

Key Words: E-cadherin • breast cancer • prognosis • immunohistochemistry • Cell adhesion • Breast cancer • Preclinical studies: biomarkers and prevention • Methodology for microarrays




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. Lacroix
Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1033 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. R.E. Rees, B. A. Onwuegbusi, V. E. Save, D. Alderson, and R. C. Fitzgerald
In vivo and In vitro Evidence for Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-Mediated Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9583 - 9590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
F. Bertucci, D. Birnbaum, and A. Goncalves
Proteomics of Breast Cancer: Principles and Potential Clinical Applications
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1772 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. F. Siddiqui, J. Pawelek, T. Handerson, C.-Y. Lin, R. B. Dickson, D. L. Rimm, and R. L. Camp
Coexpression of {beta}1,6-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V Glycoprotein Substrates Defines Aggressive Breast Cancers with Poor Outcome
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2517 - 2523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. M. McCarthy, M. Sznol, K. A. DiVito, R. L. Camp, D. L. Rimm, and H. M. Kluger
Evaluating the Expression and Prognostic Value of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2005; 11(14): 5188 - 5194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.