Clinical Cancer Research The Science of Cancer Health Disparities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Psyrri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burtness, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Psyrri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burtness, B. A.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 5856-5862, August 15, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Quantitative Determination of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer by Using Automated Quantitative Analysis

Amanda Psyrri1, Ziwei Yu2, Paul M. Weinberger2, Clarence Sasaki2, Bruce Haffty3, Robert Camp4, David Rimm4 and Barbara Ann Burtness1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medical Oncology, 2 Otolaryngology, 3 Radiation Therapy, and 4 Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Requests for reprints: Barbara Burtness, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, 333 CoHman Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111.

Background: Several lines of evidence support the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a molecular target for therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Determination of tumor EGFR levels by conventional immunohistochemistry has not always predicted antitumor efficacy. Quantitative assays may provide more accurate assessment of the level of EGFR receptor in the tumor, which may thus provide more reliable prognostic and predictive information. We studied the prognostic value of quantitative assessment of EGFR in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers treated with radiotherapy.

Experimental Design: We studied EGFR protein expression on a tissue microarray composed of 95 oropharyngeal cancer cases using an in situ molecular-based method of quantitative assessment of protein expression (AQUA) and correlated those with clinical and pathologic data. Automated, quantitative analysis uses cytokeratin to define pixels as cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot and measures intensity of EGFR expression using a Cy5-conjugated antibody within the mask. A continuous index score is generated, which is directly proportional to the number of molecules per unit area, and cases were defined as high expressing if they were above the median expression level.

Results: The mean follow-up time for survivors was 44.9 months, and for the entire cohort was 34.8 months. Patients with high tumor EGFR expression levels had a local recurrence rate of 58% compared with 17% for patients with low EGFR tumor expression (P < 0.01). Similarly, patients with high nuclear EGFR expression had a local recurrence rate of 54% compared with 21% for patients with low EGFR nuclear expression (P < 0.05). Additionally, patients with high tumor and nuclear EGFR levels had inferior disease-free survival compared with low expressors (19% versus 43% and 19% versus 45%, respectively. P < 0.05 for each). In multivariate analysis adjusting for well-characterized prognostic variables, high tumor and nuclear EGFR expression levels retained their prognostic significance.

Conclusion: The AQUA system provides a continuous measurement of EGFR on paraffin-embedded tissue and was able to reveal the association between EGFR expression and outcome expected from the biological role of EGFR. In the future, EGFR AQUA score may be useful in predicting response to EGFR-targeted therapies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Kumar, K. G. Cordell, J. S. Lee, F. P. Worden, M. E. Prince, H. H. Tran, G. T. Wolf, S. G. Urba, D. B. Chepeha, T. N. Teknos, et al.
EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3128 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Psyrri, B. Egleston, E. Pectasides, P. Weinberger, Z. Yu, D. Kowalski, C. Sasaki, B. Haffty, D. Rimm, and B. Burtness
Correlates and Determinants of Nuclear Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Content in an Oropharyngeal Cancer Tissue Microarray
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1486 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. J. Chen and C. S. Nirodi
The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: A Role in Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6555 - 6560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
O. Riesterer, L. Milas, and K. K. Ang
Use of Molecular Biomarkers for Predicting the Response to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4075 - 4083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Elser, L. L. Siu, E. Winquist, M. Agulnik, G. R. Pond, S. F. Chin, P. Francis, R. Cheiken, J. Elting, A. McNabola, et al.
Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3766 - 3773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. A. Forastiere and B. A. Burtness
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer--More Insights, but More Questions
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2152 - 2155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H.-J. Liao and G. Carpenter
Role of the Sec61 Translocon in EGF Receptor Trafficking to the Nucleus and Gene Expression
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1064 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. H. Chung, K. Ely, L. McGavran, M. Varella-Garcia, J. Parker, N. Parker, C. Jarrett, J. Carter, B. A. Murphy, J. Netterville, et al.
Increased Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Copy Number Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4170 - 4176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Kalyankrishna and J. R. Grandis
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Biology in Head and Neck Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2006; 24(17): 2666 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.