
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medical Oncology, 2 Otolaryngology, 3 Radiation Therapy, and 4 Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Requests for reprints: Barbara Burtness, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, 333 CoHman Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111.
Background: Several lines of evidence support the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a molecular target for therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Determination of tumor EGFR levels by conventional immunohistochemistry has not always predicted antitumor efficacy. Quantitative assays may provide more accurate assessment of the level of EGFR receptor in the tumor, which may thus provide more reliable prognostic and predictive information. We studied the prognostic value of quantitative assessment of EGFR in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers treated with radiotherapy.
Experimental Design: We studied EGFR protein expression on a tissue microarray composed of 95 oropharyngeal cancer cases using an in situ molecular-based method of quantitative assessment of protein expression (AQUA) and correlated those with clinical and pathologic data. Automated, quantitative analysis uses cytokeratin to define pixels as cancer (tumor mask) within the array spot and measures intensity of EGFR expression using a Cy5-conjugated antibody within the mask. A continuous index score is generated, which is directly proportional to the number of molecules per unit area, and cases were defined as high expressing if they were above the median expression level.
Results: The mean follow-up time for survivors was 44.9 months, and for the entire cohort was 34.8 months. Patients with high tumor EGFR expression levels had a local recurrence rate of 58% compared with 17% for patients with low EGFR tumor expression (P < 0.01). Similarly, patients with high nuclear EGFR expression had a local recurrence rate of 54% compared with 21% for patients with low EGFR nuclear expression (P < 0.05). Additionally, patients with high tumor and nuclear EGFR levels had inferior disease-free survival compared with low expressors (19% versus 43% and 19% versus 45%, respectively. P < 0.05 for each). In multivariate analysis adjusting for well-characterized prognostic variables, high tumor and nuclear EGFR expression levels retained their prognostic significance.
Conclusion: The AQUA system provides a continuous measurement of EGFR on paraffin-embedded tissue and was able to reveal the association between EGFR expression and outcome expected from the biological role of EGFR. In the future, EGFR AQUA score may be useful in predicting response to EGFR-targeted therapies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Kumar, K. G. Cordell, J. S. Lee, F. P. Worden, M. E. Prince, H. H. Tran, G. T. Wolf, S. G. Urba, D. B. Chepeha, T. N. Teknos, et al. EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3128 - 3137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Psyrri, B. Egleston, E. Pectasides, P. Weinberger, Z. Yu, D. Kowalski, C. Sasaki, B. Haffty, D. Rimm, and B. Burtness Correlates and Determinants of Nuclear Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Content in an Oropharyngeal Cancer Tissue Microarray Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1486 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Chen and C. S. Nirodi The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: A Role in Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6555 - 6560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Riesterer, L. Milas, and K. K. Ang Use of Molecular Biomarkers for Predicting the Response to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4075 - 4083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Elser, L. L. Siu, E. Winquist, M. Agulnik, G. R. Pond, S. F. Chin, P. Francis, R. Cheiken, J. Elting, A. McNabola, et al. Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3766 - 3773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Forastiere and B. A. Burtness Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer--More Insights, but More Questions J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2152 - 2155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Liao and G. Carpenter Role of the Sec61 Translocon in EGF Receptor Trafficking to the Nucleus and Gene Expression Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1064 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Chung, K. Ely, L. McGavran, M. Varella-Garcia, J. Parker, N. Parker, C. Jarrett, J. Carter, B. A. Murphy, J. Netterville, et al. Increased Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Copy Number Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4170 - 4176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kalyankrishna and J. R. Grandis Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Biology in Head and Neck Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2006; 24(17): 2666 - 2672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |