Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veal, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veal, G. J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 5893-5899, August 15, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Pharmacokinetics of Dactinomycin in a Pediatric Patient Population: a United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Study

Gareth J. Veal1, Michael Cole1, Julie Errington1, Annie Parry2, Juliet Hale2, Andrew D.J. Pearson2, Karen Howe3, Julia C. Chisholm3, Carol Beane4, Bernadette Brennan4, Fiona Waters5, Adam Glaser5, Sue Hemsworth6, Heather McDowell6, Yvonne Wright7, Kathy Pritchard-Jones7, Ross Pinkerton7, Gail Jenner8, James Nicholson8, Ann M. Elsworth9, Alan V. Boddy1 and UKCCSG Pharmacology Working Group

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Northern Institute for Cancer Research; 2 School of Clinical Medical Sciences (Child Health), University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne; 3 Department of Haematology/Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London; 4 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester; 5 Paediatric Oncology Unit, St. James's Hospital, Leeds; 6 Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Alder Hey, Liverpool; 7 Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey; 8 Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge; and 9 UKCCSG, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Alan V. Boddy, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-191-246-4412; Fax: 44-191-246-4301; E-mail: alan.boddy{at}ncl.ac.uk.

Purpose: Dactinomycin (actinomycin D) is an antitumor antibiotic used routinely to treat certain pediatric and adult cancers. Despite concerns over the incidence of toxicity, little is known about the pharmacology of dactinomycin. A study was done to investigate dactinomycin pharmacokinetics in children.

Experimental Design: Dactinomycin was administered to 31 patients by bolus i.v. infusion, at doses of 0.70 to 1.50 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry up to 24 hours after drug administration and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria was assessed.

Results: Pharmacokinetic data analysis suggested that a three-compartment model most accurately reflected dactinomycin pharmacokinetics. However, there was insufficient data available to fully characterize this model. A median peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 25.1 ng/mL (range, 3.2-99.2 ng/mL) was observed at 15 minutes after administration. The median exposure (AUC0-6), determined in 16 patients with sampling to 6 hours, was 2.67 mg/L.min (range, 1.12-4.90 mg/L.min). After adjusting for body size, AUC0-6 and Cmax were positively related to dose (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Patients who experienced any level of Common Toxicity Criteria grade had a 1.46-fold higher AUC0-6, 95% confidence interval (1.02-2.09). AUC0-6 was higher in patients <40 kg, possibly indicating a greater toxicity risk.

Conclusions: Data presented suggest that dosing of dactinomycin based on surface area is not optimal, either in younger patients in whom the risk of toxicity is greater, or in older patients where doses are capped.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Cervantes-Gomez, R. Nimmanapalli, and V. Gandhi
Transcription Inhibition of Heat Shock Proteins: A Strategy for Combination of 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin and Actinomycin D
Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 69(9): 3947 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. T. Mondick, L. Gibiansky, M. R. Gastonguay, J. M. Skolnik, M. Cole, G. J. Veal, A. V. Boddy, P. C. Adamson, and J. S. Barrett
Population Pharmacokinetic Investigation of Actinomycin-D in Children and Young Adults
J. Clin. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 48(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
R. E. Scully, T. L. Miller, and S. E. Lipshultz
Detecting Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity in Survivors of Childhood Cancer
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 454 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. Markasz, G. Stuber, B. Vanherberghen, E. Flaberg, E. Olah, E. Carbone, S. Eksborg, E. Klein, H. Skribek, and L. Szekely
Effect of frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs on the cytotoxic activity of human natural killer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 644 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.