
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Perspective |
1 University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; 2 University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; 3 University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; 4 Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 5 Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 6 Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 7 Tumor Biology Center, Freiburg, Germany; and 8 Karmanos Cancer Institute, Southfield, Michigan
Requests for reprints: Dietmar W. Siemann, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100385, Gainesville, FL 32610. Phone: 352-265-0287; Fax: 352-265-0759; E-mail: siemadw{at}ufl.edu.
The therapeutic potential of targeting the tumor vascular supply is now widely recognized. Intense research and development activity has resulted in a variety of investigational agents, a number of which are currently in clinical development. As these novel agents are quite distinct from the cytotoxic drugs conventionally used in the treatment of solid tumors, it will be particularly important to ensure early differentiation of these vascular-targeted therapies in order to encourage widespread understanding of their potential benefits and application in the clinic. Two distinct groups of vascular-targeted therapies have evolved: antiangiogenic agents and vascular-disrupting approaches. These differ in three key respects: their physiologic target, the type or extent of disease that is likely to be susceptible, and the treatment scheduling. Inhibitors of angiogenesis interfere with new vessel formation and therefore have a preventative action, require chronic administration, and are likely to be of particular benefit in early-stage or asymptomatic metastatic disease. Vascular-disrupting agents target the established tumor blood vessels, resulting in tumor ischemia and necrosis. These agents are therefore given acutely, show more immediate effects, and may have particular efficacy against advanced disease. It is essential that these agents can be readily distinguished from conventional therapies and that an understanding of key differences between the two types of vascular-targeted therapies is fostered. Here, a simple taxonomy and nomenclature is proposed in anticipation that the therapeutic potential of this novel class can be realized as these approaches advance in clinical settings and a new anticancer strategy becomes available in the clinic.
Key Words: vascular targeting antiangiogenic therapies vascular disruptive agents
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Zhao, E. Richer, P. P. Antich, and R. P. Mason Antivascular effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate in breast cancer xenograft assessed using dynamic bioluminescence imaging and confirmed by MRI FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2445 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Van Langendonckt, J. Donnez, S. Defrere, G. A.J. Dunselman, and P. G. Groothuis Antiangiogenic and vascular-disrupting agents in endometriosis: pitfalls and promises Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 14(5): 259 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Timke, H. Zieher, A. Roth, K. Hauser, K. E. Lipson, K. J. Weber, J. Debus, A. Abdollahi, and P. E. Huber Combination of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor/Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition Markedly Improves Radiation Tumor Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 2210 - 2219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gould, F. R. Westwood, J. O. Curwen, S. E. Ashton, D. W. Roberts, S. C. Lovick, and A. J. Ryan Effect of Pretreatment With Atenolol and Nifedipine on ZD6126-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Rats J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1724 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. He, T. A. Luster, and P. E. Thorpe Radiation-Enhanced Vascular Targeting of Human Lung Cancers in Mice with a Monoclonal Antibody That Binds Anionic Phospholipids Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5211 - 5218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shaked and R. S. Kerbel Antiangiogenic Strategies on Defense: On the Possibility of Blocking Rebounds by the Tumor Vasculature after Chemotherapy Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7055 - 7058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Giaccone The Potential of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 13(7): 1961 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Milowsky, D. M. Nanus, L. Kostakoglu, C. E. Sheehan, S. Vallabhajosula, S. J. Goldsmith, J. S. Ross, and N. H. Bander Vascular Targeted Therapy With Anti-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Monoclonal Antibody J591 in Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 540 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dome, M. J.C. Hendrix, S. Paku, J. Tovari, and J. Timar Alternative Vascularization Mechanisms in Cancer: Pathology and Therapeutic Implications Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Horsman and D. W. Siemann Pathophysiologic Effects of Vascular-Targeting Agents and the Implications for Combination with Conventional Therapies Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11520 - 11539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. N. Kim, J. Huamani, K. J. Niermann, H. Lee, L. Geng, L. L. Leavitt, R. A. Baheza, C. C. Jones, S. Tumkur, T. E. Yankeelov, et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Tumor Vasculature Response to Radiation-Mediated, Vasculature-Targeted Therapy Using Quantified Power Doppler Sonography: Implications for Improvement of Therapy Schedules. J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2006; 25(12): 1507 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Skliarenko, S. J. Lunt, M. L. Gordon, A. Vitkin, M. Milosevic, and R. P. Hill Effects of the Vascular Disrupting Agent ZD6126 on Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Cell Survival in Tumors Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2074 - 2080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Kirschner Emerging Treatment Strategies for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A New Hope J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 14 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |