
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
1 Cancer Diagnosis Program, 2 Biometric Research Branch, and 3 Center for Bioinformatics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Departments of 4 Surgery, 5 Pediatrics, and 6 Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School and 7 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 8 Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; 9 Department of Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Departments of 10 Pathology and 11 Molecular Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 12 Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and 13 Whitehead Institute-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Genome Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Kevin K. Dobbin, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852. Phone: 301-451-6244; E-mail: dobbinke{at}mail.nih.gov.
A key step in bringing gene expression data into clinical practice is the conduct of large studies to confirm preliminary models. The performance of such confirmatory studies and the transition to clinical practice requires that microarray data from different laboratories are comparable and reproducible. We designed a study to assess the comparability of data from four laboratories that will conduct a larger microarray profiling confirmation project in lung adenocarcinomas. To test the feasibility of combining data across laboratories, frozen tumor tissues, cell line pellets, and purified RNA samples were analyzed at each of the four laboratories. Samples of each type and several subsamples from each tumor and each cell line were blinded before being distributed. The laboratories followed a common protocol for all steps of tissue processing, RNA extraction, and microarray analysis using Affymetrix Human Genome U133A arrays. High within-laboratory and between-laboratory correlations were observed on the purified RNA samples, the cell lines, and the frozen tumor tissues. Intraclass correlation within laboratories was only slightly stronger than between laboratories, and the intraclass correlation tended to be weakest for genes expressed at low levels and showing small variation. Finally, hierarchical cluster analysis revealed that the repeated samples clustered together regardless of the laboratory in which the experiments were done. The findings indicate that under properly controlled conditions it is feasible to perform complete tumor microarray analysis, from tissue processing to hybridization and scanning, at multiple independent laboratories for a single study.
Key Words: oligonucleotide microarrays reproducibility interlaboratory comparison gene expression
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. I. Dumur, M. Lyons-Weiler, C. Sciulli, C. T. Garrett, I. Schrijver, T. K. Holley, J. Rodriguez-Paris, J. R. Pollack, J. L. Zehnder, M. Price, et al. Interlaboratory Performance of a Microarray-Based Gene Expression Test to Determine Tissue of Origin in Poorly Differentiated and Undifferentiated Cancers J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2008; 10(1): 67 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jayachandran, J.-i. Sazaki, M. Nishizaki, K. Xu, L. Girard, J. D. Minna, J. A. Roth, and L. Ji Fragile Histidine Triad Mediated Tumor Suppression of Lung Cancer by Targeting Multiple Components of the Ras/Rho GTPase Molecular Switch Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10379 - 10388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. A. Ioannidis Is Molecular Profiling Ready for Use in Clinical Decision Making? Oncologist, March 1, 2007; 12(3): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Thomas, B. Weir, and M. Meyerson Genomic approaches to lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 12(14): 4384s - 4391s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Verducci, V. F. Melfi, S. Lin, Z. Wang, S. Roy, and C. K. Sen Microarray analysis of gene expression: considerations in data mining and statistical treatment Physiol Genomics, May 16, 2006; 25(3): 355 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ma, M. Lyons-Weiler, W. Liang, W. LaFramboise, J. R. Gilbertson, M. J. Becich, and F. A. Monzon In Vitro Transcription Amplification and Labeling Methods Contribute to the Variability of Gene Expression Profiling with DNA Microarrays J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2006; 8(2): 183 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J S Reis-Filho, C Westbury, and J-Y Pierga The impact of expression profiling on prognostic and predictive testing in breast cancer. J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 59(3): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Thompson, B. A. Rosenzweig, P. S. Pine, J. Retief, Y. Turpaz, C. A. Afshari, H. K. Hamadeh, M. A. Damore, M. Boedigheimer, E. Blomme, et al. Use of a mixed tissue RNA design for performance assessments on multiple microarray formats Nucleic Acids Res., December 23, 2005; 33(22): e187 - e187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Newkirk, J. H.M. Knoll, and P. K. Rogan Distortion of quantitative genomic and expression hybridization by Cot-1 DNA: mitigation of this effect Nucleic Acids Res., December 14, 2005; 33(22): e191 - e191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Simon Roadmap for Developing and Validating Therapeutically Relevant Genomic Classifiers J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2005; 23(29): 7332 - 7341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Espinosa, J.A. F. Vara, A. Redondo, J.J. Sanchez, D. Hardisson, P. Zamora, F. G. Pastrana, P. Cejas, B. Martinez, A. Suarez, et al. Breast Cancer Prognosis Determined by Gene Expression Profiling: A Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Study J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2005; 23(29): 7278 - 7285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bullinger and P. J.M. Valk Gene Expression Profiling in Acute Myeloid Leukemia J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2005; 23(26): 6296 - 6305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Meyerson and D. Carbone Genomic and Proteomic Profiling of Lung Cancers: Lung Cancer Classification in the Age of Targeted Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3219 - 3226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |