Clinical Cancer Research Versailles No Abst Advances in Breast Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, T.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 720-727, January 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Effect of Tumor Host Microenvironment on Photodynamic Therapy in a Rat Prostate Tumor Model

Bin Chen1, Brian W. Pogue1,5, Xiaodong Zhou1, Julia A. O'Hara2, Nicolas Solban4, Eugene Demidenko3, P. Jack Hoopes1,4 and Tayyaba Hasan4

1 Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College and 2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire; 3 Division of Biostatistics, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and 4 Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and 5 Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Brian W. Pogue or Bin Chen, Thayer School of Engineering, 8000 Cummings Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755. Phone: 603-646-3861; Fax: 603-646-3856; E-mail: pogue{at}dartmouth.edu or bin.chen{at}dartmouth.edu.

Purpose: Tumor host microenvironment plays an important role in tumor growth, metastasis, and response to cancer therapy. In this study, the influence of tumor host environment on tumor pathophysiology, photosensitizer distribution, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment effect was examined in the metastatic at lymph node and lung (MatLyLu) rat prostate tumor.

Experimental Design: MatLyLu tumors implanted in different host environment [i.e., orthotopically (in the prostate) or s.c.] were compared for difference in vessel density, average vessel size, vascular permeability, tumor vascular endothelial growth factor production, and tumor oxygenation. Uptake of photosensitizer verteporfin in tumors in both sites was determined by fluorescence microscopy. To compare tumor response to PDT, both orthotopic and s.c. MatLyLu tumors were given the same doses of verteporfin and laser light treatment, and PDT-induced tumor necrotic area was measured histologically.

Results: Orthotopic MatLyLu tumors were found to grow faster, have higher vessel density and more permeable vasculature, have higher vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels, and have lower tumor hypoxic fraction than the s.c. tumors. Uptake of photosensitizer verteporfin in the orthotopic tumor was higher than in the s.c. tumors at 15 minutes after injection (1 mg/kg, i.v.), and became similar at 3 hours after injection. For the vascular targeting PDT treatment (0.25 mg/kg verteporfin, 50 J/cm2 at 50 mW/cm2, 15 minutes drug-light interval), there was no significant difference in PDT-induced tumor necrotic area between the orthotopic and s.c. tumors, with 85% to 90% necrosis in both types of tumors. However, tumor necrosis induced by the cellular targeting PDT (1 mg/kg verteporfin, 50 J/cm2 at 50 mW/cm2, 3 hours drug-light interval) was significantly different in the orthotopic (64%) versus the s.c. (29%) tumors.

Conclusions: Tumor host environment can significantly affect photosensitizer verteporfin distribution and PDT treatment effect. Verteporfin-PDT regimen targeting tumor cells is more sensitive to such influence than the vascular targeting PDT. Our study showed the importance of tumor host environment in determining tumor physiologic properties and tumor response to PDT. To obtain clinically relevant information, orthotopic tumor model should be used in the experimental studies.

Key Words: photodynamic therapy (PDT) • verteporfin • tumor microenvironment • tumor vasculature • tumor oxygenation • tumor response




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Solban, S. K. Pal, S. K. Alok, C. K. Sung, and T. Hasan
Mechanistic Investigation and Implications of Photodynamic Therapy Induction of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5633 - 5640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Chen, B. W. Pogue, J. M. Luna, R. L. Hardman, P. J. Hoopes, and T. Hasan
Tumor Vascular Permeabilization by Vascular-Targeting Photosensitization: Effects, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Implications
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 917 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.