
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Recent Advances and Future Directions in Endocrine Manipulation of Breast Cancer |
Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Angela Brodie, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. E-mail: abrodie{at}umaryland.edu.
In previous studies using a xenograft model with tumors of human estrogen receptor (ER)positive breast cancer cells transfected with aromatase (MCF-7Ca), we explored the antitumor efficacy of treatment combining the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole with tamoxifen. However, treatment with this combination resulted in tumor suppression similar to tamoxifen alone but was less effective than letrozole alone. Clinical findings with the nonsteroidal inhibitor anastrozole in combination with tamoxifen (ATAC trial) were consistent with our results. Although letrozole was the most effective single agent in the model, tumors ultimately began to grow during continued treatment. To investigate the mechanisms by which tumors adapted to growth during letrozole treatment, we determined the expression of proteins in tumors during letrozole treatment compared with the tumors of control mice. We found that tumors initially up-regulated the ER, but subsequently receptor levels decreased in tumors unresponsive to letrozole. Adapter proteins (p-Shc and Grb-2) as well as all of the signaling proteins in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade (p-Raf, p-MEK1/2, and p-MAPK) but not Akt were increased in tumors no longer responsive to letrozole. The results suggest that tumor cells adapt to estrogen deprivation during letrozole treatment by activation of alternate signaling pathways. When letrozole was combined with the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant, which down-regulates ER, the combination was extremely effective. Tumors regressed by 45% and were maintained without growth for the duration of the experiment (29 weeks). Thus, achieving more complete estrogen blockade may delay development of hormone-independent signaling pathways regulating proliferation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Miller, J. Bartlett, A. M. H. Brodie, R. W. Brueggemeier, E. di Salle, P. E. Lonning, A. Llombart, N. Maass, T. Maudelonde, H. Sasano, et al. Aromatase Inhibitors: Are There Differences Between Steroidal and Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors and Do They Matter? Oncologist, August 1, 2008; 13(8): 829 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. R. Robertson Fulvestrant (Faslodex(R)) How to Make a Good Drug Better Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 774 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Messina, W. McCaskill-Stevens, and J. W. Lampe Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2006; 98(18): 1275 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |