
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Recent Advances and Future Directions in Endocrine Manipulation of Breast Cancer |
1 Academic Department of Biochemistry; 2 Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; 3 Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, Surrey; 4 Edinburgh Breast Unit, Edinburgh; 5 Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset; 6 Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear; and 7 AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Mitch Dowsett, Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom. Phone: +44-20-7808-2885; Fax: +44-20-7376-3918; E-mail: mitch.dowsett{at}icr.ac.uk.
Purpose: Neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy for breast cancer may allow for the development of intermediate markers of treatment benefit, thereby circumventing the need for efficacy trials of adjuvant therapy, which require much larger patient numbers and longer follow-up. The aim of this studyas part of the Immediate Preoperative "Arimidex" (anastrozole), Tamoxifen, or Arimidex Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) trial (n = 330)was to test the hypotheses that changes in Ki-67 after 2 weeks and/or 12 weeks: (i) differed between treatments, (ii) predicted clinical tumor response, and/or (iii) may predict long-term outcome differences between treatments in adjuvant therapy.
Experimental Design: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial compared these same agents in the adjuvant setting. Biomarkers were measured in biopsy specimens taken before and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment.
Results: Suppression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 after 2 and 12 weeks was significantly greater with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001) but was similar between tamoxifen and the combination (P = 0.600 and P = 0.912). This result closely parallels that seen for the relative recurrence-free survival with the treatments after a median follow-up of 31 months in the ATAC trial in 9,366 patients. Against expectations, apoptosis was not increased in any of the treatment arms.
Conclusions: The data indicate that short-term changes in proliferation in the neoadjuvant setting may be able to predict outcome during adjuvant use of the same treatments. If this can be confirmed, these findings could lead to a profound change in approaches to drug development in breast cancer. The data indicate that estrogen is not an important survival factor for human breast cancer cells.
Key Words: biomarker aromatase inhibitor preoperative adjuvant therapy apoptosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Mustacchi, M. Mansutti, C. Sacco, S. Barni, A. Farris, M. Cazzaniga, M. Cozzi, and C. Dellach Neo-adjuvant exemestane in elderly patients with breast cancer: a phase II, multicentre, open-label, Italian study Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 655 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Generali, F. M. Buffa, A. Berruti, M. P. Brizzi, L. Campo, S. Bonardi, A. Bersiga, G. Allevi, M. Milani, S. Aguggini, et al. Phosphorylated ER{alpha}, HIF-1{alpha}, and MAPK Signaling As Predictors of Primary Endocrine Treatment Response and Resistance in Patients With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2009; 27(2): 227 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Haddad and D. Yee Of Mice and (Wo)Men: Is This Any Way to Test a New Drug? J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 830 - 832. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al. Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gralow, H. J. Burstein, W. Wood, G. N. Hortobagyi, L. Gianni, G. von Minckwitz, A. U. Buzdar, I. E. Smith, W. F. Symmans, B. Singh, et al. Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 814 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Ellis Improving Outcomes for Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Back to the Drawing Board J Natl Cancer Inst, February 6, 2008; 100(3): 159 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dowsett, I. E. Smith, S. R. Ebbs, J. M. Dixon, A. Skene, R. A'Hern, J. Salter, S. Detre, M. Hills, and G. Walsh Prognostic Value of Ki67 Expression After Short-Term Presurgical Endocrine Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, January 17, 2007; 99(2): 167 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Furth and E. D. Halama What Do Shifts in Indicators of Apoptosis Indicate about the Cancer Process? J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2700S - 2703S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Ellis, Y. Tao, O. Young, S. White, A. D. Proia, J. Murray, L. Renshaw, D. Faratian, J. Thomas, M. Dowsett, et al. Estrogen-Independent Proliferation Is Present in Estrogen-Receptor HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Letrozole J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 24(19): 3019 - 3025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Dowsett, S Johnston, L-A Martin, J Salter, M Hills, S Detre, M C Gutierrez, S K Mohsin, J Shou, D C Allred, et al. Growth factor signalling and response to endocrine therapy: the Royal Marsden Experience Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S113 - S117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R D Johnston Clinical trials of intracellular signal transductions inhibitors for breast cancer -- a strategy to overcome endocrine resistance Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S145 - S157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dowsett, S. R. Ebbs, J. M. Dixon, A. Skene, C. Griffith, I. Boeddinghaus, J. Salter, S. Detre, M. Hills, S. Ashley, et al. Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer--A Study from the IMPACT Trialists J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2005; 23(11): 2477 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |