
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Disciplina de Oncologia do Departamento de Radiologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, 2 Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, 3 Instituto de Matemática e Estatística da Universidade de São Paulo; 4 Instituto Ludwig de Pesquisa sobre o Câncer; 5 Hospital do Câncer A.C. Camargo; 6 Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer; 7 Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, São Paulo; and 8 Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil
Requests for reprints: Maria Mitzi Brentani, Disciplina de Oncologia do Departamento de Radiologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo #455, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Phone: 55-11-3082-6580; Fax: 55-11-3082-6580; E-mail: mbrentani{at}lim24.fm.usp.br.
Purpose: This study was designed to identify genes that could predict response to doxorubicin-based primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Experimental Design: Biopsy samples were obtained before primary treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. RNA was extracted and amplified and gene expression was analyzed using cDNA microarrays.
Results: Response to chemotherapy was evaluated in 51 patients, and based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, 42 patients, who presented at least a partial response (
30% reduction in tumor dimension), were classified as responsive. Gene profile of samples, divided into training set (n = 38) and independent validation set (n = 13), were at first analyzed against a cDNA microarray platform containing 692 genes. Unsupervised clustering could not separate responders from nonresponders. A classifier was identified comprising EMILIN1, FAM14B, and PBEF, which however could not correctly classify samples included in the validation set. Our next step was to analyze gene profile in a more comprehensive cDNA microarray platform, containing 4,608 open reading frame expressed sequence tags. Seven samples of the initial training set (all responder patients) could not be analyzed. Unsupervised clustering could correctly group all the resistant samples as well as at least 85% of the sensitive samples. Additionally, a classifier, including PRSS11, MTSS1, and CLPTM1, could correctly distinguish 95.4% of the 44 samples analyzed, with only two misclassifications, one sensitive sample and one resistant tumor. The robustness of this classifier is 2.5 greater than the first one.
Conclusion: A trio of genes might potentially distinguish doxorubicin-responsive from nonresponsive tumors, but further validation by a larger number of samples is still needed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Puhalla, E. Mrozek, D. Young, S. Ottman, A. McVey, K. Kendra, N. J. Merriman, M. Knapp, T. Patel, M. E. Thompson, et al. Randomized Phase II Adjuvant Trial of Dose-Dense Docetaxel Before or After Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1691 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Peintinger, K. Anderson, C. Mazouni, H. M. Kuerer, C. Hatzis, F. Lin, G. N. Hortobagyi, W. F. Symmans, and L. Pusztai Thirty-Gene Pharmacogenomic Test Correlates with Residual Cancer Burden after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4078 - 4082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Shimizu, M. Ando, T. Kouno, N. Katsumata, and Y. Fujiwara Current Trends and Controversies over Pre-operative Chemotherapy for Women with Operable Breast Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 3, 2007; (2007) hyl122v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pusztai Chips to Bedside: Incorporation of Microarray Data into Clinical Practice Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7209 - 7214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Watters and C. J. Roberts Developing gene expression signatures of pathway deregulation in tumors. Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2006; 5(10): 2444 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |