Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freedland, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freedland, S. J.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 11, 7735-7742, November 1, 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Racial Differences in Prognostic Value of Adult Height for Biochemical Progression Following Radical Prostatectomy

Stephen J. Freedland1, William J. Aronson2,3, Bruce Trock1, Pinchas Cohen4, Christopher J. Kane5,6, Christopher L. Amling7, Joseph C. Presti, Jr.8,9, Martha K. Terris10,11 for the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database Study Group

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 2 Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System; Departments of 3 Urology and 4 Pediatrics, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; 5 Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center San Francisco; 6 Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; 7 Department of Urology, San Diego Naval Hospital, San Diego, California; 8 Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine; 9 Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California; 10 Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Medical Center; and 11 Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia

Requests for reprints: Stephen J. Freedland, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-2101. Phone: 410-955-2520; Fax: 410-502-9336; E-mail: sfreedl1{at}jhmi.edu.

Purpose: Adult height, as a surrogate of childhood and adolescent hormone activity and diet, has been associated with the risk for development and death from prostate cancer in predominantly White populations. However, hormonal activity and diets vary between races. We examined whether height was significantly associated with biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy and whether there was an interaction between height and race.

Experimental Design: Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine if height significantly predicted biochemical progression among 1,503 men (450 Black and 1,053 White) treated with radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2003. We examined for possible interactions between height and race.

Results: Taller men (>175.3 cm) were significantly younger (P = 0.001), treated in more recent years (P = 0.02), had more clinical stage T1 disease (P = 0.001), and were less likely to have extraprostatic extension (P = 0.02) than shorter men (≤175.3 cm). Height was not significantly related to race, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations, biopsy or pathologic Gleason sum, positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node metastasis. Height was significantly associated with progression among Black men [relative risk (RR), 1.67; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.00-2.79] but not among White men (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.77-1.38). The interaction between race and height for predicting biochemical progression was statistically significant (Pinteraction = 0.05).

Conclusions: There was an interaction between height and race in that height predicted progression for Black men but not for White men. The explanation for these findings is unclear, although lower insulin-like growth factor–binding protein-3 concentrations among Black men may be involved.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.