
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Developmental Therapeutics Program, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pathology and Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio and 2 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Afshin Dowlati, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106. Phone: 216-844-1228; Fax: 216-844-5234; E-mail: afshin.dowlati{at}CASE.edu.
Purpose: To determine the biological modulatory dose of SU5416, we employed a novel trial design, where "dose de-escalation" was based on demonstrable biological changes observed at the maximum tolerated dose. If such an effect was shown, dose de-escalation to a predefined dose level would occur to determine if the lower dose exhibited the same amount of pharmacodynamic effect as the higher dose.
Experimental Design: Ten patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled at each dose level. One of the following pharmacodynamic effects was considered significant: (a) a 35% decrease in microvessel density in sequential tumor biopsies and (b) a 35% decrease in blood flow within tumor as assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, soluble E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule, and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor were measured sequentially.
Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Sequential tumor biopsies in all evaluable patients showed an increase in microvessel density. Only one patient met the intended pharmacodynamic end point of >35% reduction in blood flow. There was a significant increase in both soluble E-selectin and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule levels pretreatment versus levels at the time of removal of patients from study (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Levels of serum fibrinogen rose with therapy. There was a trend toward increase in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels.
Conclusion: SU5416 does not result in decreased blood flow in tumors or a decrease in microvessel density. This corresponds to the lack of clinical activity seen with this agent. Our clinical trial design termed dose de-escalation is a novel approach to determine the in vivo biological effects of targeted therapies in cancer patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Baar, P. Silverman, J. Lyons, P. Fu, F. Abdul-Karim, N. Ziats, J. Wasman, P. Hartman, J. Jesberger, L. Dumadag, et al. A Vasculature-Targeting Regimen of Preoperative Docetaxel with or without Bevacizumab for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Impact on Angiogenic Biomarkers Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 15(10): 3583 - 3590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dowlati, S. Manda, J. Gibbons, S. C. Remick, L. Patrick, and P. Fu Multi-Institutional Phase I Trials of Anticancer Agents J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2008; 26(12): 1926 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dowlati, R. Gray, A. B. Sandler, J. H. Schiller, and D. H. Johnson Cell Adhesion Molecules, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab--an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 14(5): 1407 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Overmoyer, P. Fu, C. Hoppel, T. Radivoyevitch, R. Shenk, M. Persons, P. Silverman, K. Robertson, N. P. Ziats, J. K. Wasman, et al. Inflammatory Breast Cancer as a Model Disease to Study Tumor Angiogenesis: Results of a Phase IB Trial of Combination SU5416 and Doxorubicin Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5862 - 5868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Emmenegger and R. S. Kerbel A Dynamic De-Escalating Dosing Strategy to Determine the Optimal Biological Dose for Antiangiogenic Drugs Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7589 - 7592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |