
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medicine, 2 Pathology and Immunology, 3 Genetics, 4 Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, and 5 Division of Biostatistics, and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Requests for reprints: Howard L. McLeod, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8069, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: 314-747-2060; Fax: 314-362-3764; E-mail: hmcleod{at}im.wustl.edu.
Although colorectal cancer has the third highest cancer mortality rate, the treatment remains far from optimized with patients showing variable responses to standard treatment. Molecular differences in pharmacologically relevant genes may contribute to the variability in response. This study used Taqman PCR to investigate the expression of 24 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pathway genes in colorectal cancer using paired nontumor and tumor sample from 52 patients with Dukes' C colon cancer. In comparing tumor versus nonmalignant tissue, 14 of the 24 genes showed significant variation in gene expression. For 11 of these same genes (FPGS, DHFR, GGH, NME1, NME2, RRM2, UMPH2, UNG, UMPS, TP53, and TK1), a significant proportion of the patients showed an over expression of the particular gene in tumor tissue with a tumor-to-nonmalignant (T/N) ratio >1.2, whereas one gene (DPYD) showed the converse with a large number of patients showing a lower expression in the tumor tissue (T/N < 0.8). Multiple gene correlations for the genes of the 5-FU pathway were found with the Spearman rank correlation of >0.6 (all P > 0.001), suggesting possible coregulation mechanisms. Hierarchical clustering analysis created at least three groups of genes, which were consistent with groupings by the other statistical methods. Additionally, the hierarchical clustering showed two distinct groups of patients based on their gene expression. These variations in gene expression could provide valuable insights for optimizing treatment selection for patients with colorectal cancer.
Key Words: colorectal cancer 5-fluorouracil drug pathways
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Mourad, B. M. Snook, J. T. Prabhakar, T. A. Mansfield, and N. P. Schultes A fluoroorotic acid-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis defective in the uptake of uracil J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3563 - 3573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. O'Neil and H. L. McLeod Thymidine Phosphorylase and Capecitabine: A Predictive Marker for Therapy Selection? J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4051 - 4053. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu, H. L. McLeod, H. H. Ezzeldin, and R. B. Diasio Methylation of the DPYD Promoter and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency. Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 12(12): 3864 - 3864. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Basil, Y. Zhao, K. Zavaglia, P. Jin, M. C. Panelli, S. Voiculescu, S. Mandruzzato, H. M. Lee, B. Seliger, R. S. Freedman, et al. Common cancer biomarkers. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 2953 - 2961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |