
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Perspective |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; 2 Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; 3 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 4 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; 5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota and Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Fairview University Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 6 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia; 7 Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas; 8 CCS Associates, Mountain View, California; 9 Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and 10 Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Requests for reprints: Gary J. Kelloff, Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnostics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, EPN 6130 Executive Boulevard, Suite 6058, Bethesda, MD 20892. Fax: 301-480-3507; E-mail: kelloffg{at}mail.nih.gov.
2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, nonsmall cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings (lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation and approval of novel regimens and therapies.
Key Words: FDG-PET molecular imaging oncology drug development
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Emmering, N. C. Krak, J. J. M. Van der Hoeven, M. D. Spreeuwenberg, J. W. R. Twisk, S. Meijer, H. M. Pinedo, and O. S. Hoekstra Preoperative [18F] FDG-PET after chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic value as compared with histopathology Ann. Onc., June 13, 2008; (2008) mdn185v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Jiang, H. Kenerson, L. Aicher, R. Miyaoka, J. Eary, J. Bissler, and R. S. Yeung The Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Regulates Trafficking of Glucose Transporters and Glucose Uptake Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 172(6): 1748 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gillies, I. Robey, and R. A. Gatenby Causes and Consequences of Increased Glucose Metabolism of Cancers J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 24S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Plathow and W. A. Weber Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 43S - 63S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Winnard Jr., A. P. Pathak, S. Dhara, S. Y. Cho, V. Raman, and M. G. Pomper Molecular Imaging of Metastatic Potential J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 96S - 112S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Hillner, B. A. Siegel, D. Liu, A. F. Shields, I. F. Gareen, L. Hanna, S. H. Stine, and R. E. Coleman Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Alone on Expected Management of Patients With Cancer: Initial Results From the National Oncologic PET Registry J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2155 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Williams and G. M. Kolodny Method for Decreasing Uptake of 18F-FDG by Hypermetabolic Brown Adipose Tissue on PET Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1406 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, S. Vallabhajosula, W. J. McBride, E. A. Rossi, C.-H. Chang, S. J. Goldsmith, and D. M. Goldenberg Metastatic Human Colonic Carcinoma: Molecular Imaging with Pretargeted SPECT and PET in a Mouse Model Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 497 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Boss, R. V. Olmos, M. Sinaasappel, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H. M. Schellens Application of PET/CT in the Development of Novel Anticancer Drugs Oncologist, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 25 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hoffman, S. S. Gambhir, and G. J. Kelloff Regulatory and Reimbursement Challenges for Molecular Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 645 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Seam, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3507 - 3516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Hillner, D. Liu, R. E. Coleman, A. F. Shields, I. F. Gareen, L. Hanna, S. H. Stine, and B. A. Siegel The National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR): Design and Analysis Plan J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1901 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, W. J. McBride, E. A. Rossi, C.-H. Chang, and D. M. Goldenberg Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting of Radionuclides for Immuno Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Immuno Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging: An Update Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5577s - 5585s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Hausner, D. DiCara, J. Marik, J. F. Marshall, and J. L. Sutcliffe Use of a Peptide Derived from Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus for the Noninvasive Imaging of Human Cancer: Generation and Evaluation of 4-[18F]Fluorobenzoyl A20FMDV2 for In vivo Imaging of Integrin {alpha}v{beta}6 Expression with Positron Emission Tomography Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7833 - 7840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Schuster The Opportunities and Challenges of Developing Imaging Biomarkers to Study Lung Function and Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2007; 176(3): 224 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Prasanphanich, P. K. Nanda, T. L. Rold, L. Ma, M. R. Lewis, J. C. Garrison, T. J. Hoffman, G. L. Sieckman, S. D. Figueroa, and C. J. Smith [64Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7-14)NH2] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12462 - 12467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Torigian, S. S. Huang, M. Houseni, and A. Alavi Functional Imaging of Cancer with Emphasis on Molecular Techniques CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2007; 57(4): 206 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Hoffman and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging: The Vision and Opportunity for Radiology in the Future Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 39 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Mankoff, J. F. Eary, J. M. Link, M. Muzi, J. G. Rajendran, A. M. Spence, and K. A. Krohn Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3460 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Senzer, J. Nemunaitis, M. Nemunaitis, J. Lamont, M. Gore, H. Gabra, R. Eeles, N. Sodha, F. J. Lynch, L. A. Zumstein, et al. p53 therapy in a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2007; 6(5): 1478 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Lindsay, B. A. Siegel, S. R. Tunis, B. E. Hillner, A. F. Shields, B. P. Carey, and R. E. Coleman The National Oncologic PET Registry: Expanded Medicare Coverage for PET Under Coverage with Evidence Development Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1109 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wu, A. Neilson, A. L. Swift, R. Moran, J. Tamagnine, D. Parslow, S. Armistead, K. Lemire, J. Orrell, J. Teich, et al. Multiparameter metabolic analysis reveals a close link between attenuated mitochondrial bioenergetic function and enhanced glycolysis dependency in human tumor cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C125 - C136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nwogu, G. Fischer, D. Tan, M. Glinianski, D. Lamonica, and T. Demmy Radioguided Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1815 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Arienti, S. Pretolani, S. N. Goldberg, S. G. Silverman, D. A. Gervais, R. Lencioni, D. Sacks, and D. Dupuy How to Report and Compare Complications of Image-guided Ablation Therapies: Comments on Seeding and the Use of a Sole Common Denominator for Liver Tumors. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 625 - 627. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. McBride, P. Zanzonico, R. M. Sharkey, C. Noren, H. Karacay, E. A. Rossi, M. J. Losman, P.-Y. Brard, C.-H. Chang, S. M. Larson, et al. Bispecific Antibody Pretargeting PET (ImmunoPET) with an 124I-Labeled Hapten-Peptide J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1678 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. El-Deiry, C. C. Sigman, and G. J. Kelloff Imaging and Oncologic Drug Development J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3261 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Larson and L. H. Schwartz 18F-FDG PET as a Candidate for "Qualified Biomarker": Functional Assessment of Treatment Response in Oncology J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 901 - 903. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Sullivan The Role of Molecular Imaging in Development of Novel Therapies Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2006; 2006(1): 133 - 135. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Goldenberg, R. M. Sharkey, G. Paganelli, J. Barbet, and J.-F. Chatal Antibody Pretargeting Advances Cancer Radioimmunodetection and Radioimmunotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 823 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lee, W. I. Yang, Y. N. Park, K. S. Kim, J. S. Choi, M. Yun, D. Ko, T.-S. Kim, A. E.H. Cho, H. M. Kim, et al. Different Glucose Uptake and Glycolytic Mechanisms Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma with Increased 18F-FDG Uptake J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1753 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, T. M. Cardillo, C.-H. Chang, W. J. McBride, E. A. Rossi, I. D. Horak, and D. M. Goldenberg Improving the Delivery of Radionuclides for Imaging and Therapy of Cancer Using Pretargeting Methods Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7109s - 7121s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |