
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Northern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; 2 Cancer Research UK Medical Oncology Unit and 3 Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and 4 Cancer Research UK Carcinogenesis Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: E. Ruth Plummer, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Paul O'Gorman Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle uponTyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-191-246-4414; Fax: 44-191-246-4301; E-mail: E.R.Plummer{at}ncl.ac.uk.
Purpose: Temozolomide, a DNA methylating agent used to treat melanoma, induces DNA damage, which is repaired by O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase (ATase) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1)dependent base excision repair. The current study was done to define the effect of temozolomide on DNA integrity and relevant repair enzymes as a prelude to a phase I trial of the combination of temozolomide with a PARP inhibitor.
Experimental Design: Temozolomide (200 mg/m2 oral administration) was given to 12 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were analyzed for PARP activity, DNA single-strand breakage, ATase levels, and DNA methylation. PARP activity was also measured in tumor biopsies from 9 of 12 patients and in PBLs from healthy volunteers.
Results: Temozolomide pharmacokinetics were consistent with previous reports. Temozolomide therapy caused a substantial and sustained elevation of N7-methylguanine levels, a modest and sustained reduction in ATase activity, and a modest and transient increase in DNA strand breaks and PARP activity in PBLs. PARP-1 activity in tumor homogenates was variable (828 ± 599 pmol PAR monomer/mg protein) and was not consistently affected by temozolomide treatment.
Conclusions: The effect of temozolomide reported here are consistent with those documented in previous studies with temozolomide and similar drug, dacarbazine, demonstrating that a representative patient population was investigated. Furthermore, PARP activity was not inhibited by temozolomide treatment and this newly validated pharmacodynamic assay is therefore suitable for use in a proof-of-principle phase I trial a PARP-1 inhibitor in combination with temozolomide.
Key Words: Pharmacodynamic analysis COMET assay Immunoblot PARP assay
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Daniel, A. L. Rozanska, H. D. Thomas, E. A. Mulligan, Y. Drew, D. J. Castelbuono, Z. Hostomsky, E. R. Plummer, A. V. Boddy, D. A. Tweddle, et al. Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Enhances Temozolomide and Topotecan Activity against Childhood Neuroblastoma Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1241 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Clarke, E. A. Mulligan, P. T. Grogan, A. C. Mladek, B. L. Carlson, M. A. Schroeder, N. J. Curtin, Z. Lou, P. A. Decker, W. Wu, et al. Effective sensitization of temozolomide by ABT-888 is lost with development of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenograft lines Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2009; 8(2): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Plummer, C. Jones, M. Middleton, R. Wilson, J. Evans, A. Olsen, N. Curtin, A. Boddy, P. McHugh, D. Newell, et al. Phase I Study of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, AG014699, in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 14(23): 7917 - 7923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, Y. Shi, R. Guan, C. Donawho, Y. Luo, J. Palma, G.-d. Zhu, E. F. Johnson, L. E. Rodriguez, N. Ghoreishi-Haack, et al. Potentiation of Temozolomide Cytotoxicity by Poly(ADP)Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor ABT-888 Requires a Conversion of Single-Stranded DNA Damages to Double-Stranded DNA Breaks Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 6(10): 1621 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Jones and E R Plummer PARP inhibitors and cancer therapy -- early results and potential applications Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2008; 81(Special_Issue_1): S2 - S5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Calvert and R. Plummer The Development of Phase I Cancer Trial Methodologies: the Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic End Points Sets the Scene for Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3664 - 3669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. McKenna, S. R. McKeown, and V. J. McKelvey-Martin Potential use of the comet assay in the clinical management of cancer Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ratnam and J. A. Low Current Development of Clinical Inhibitors of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Oncology Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 13(5): 1383 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |