Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaaf, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenberg, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaaf, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rothenberg, M. L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 3782-3791, June 15, 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Irinotecan in Refractory Solid Tumor Patients with Hepatic Dysfunction

Larry J. Schaaf1, Lisa A. Hammond2, Stuart J. Tipping4, Richard M. Goldberg5, Rakesh Goel6, John G. Kuhn3, Langdon L. Miller7, Linda D. Compton7, Laura A. Cisar7, Gary L. Elfring7, Gabriela Gruia7, J. Patrick McGovren7, Nicoletta Pirotta7, Donghua Yin7, Amarnath Sharma7, Barbara A. Duncan7 and Mace L. Rothenberg8

Authors' Affiliations: 1 The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; 2 Cancer Therapy Research Center; 3 University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; 4 Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin; 5 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 6 Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 7 Pfizer Corporation, New York, New York; and 8 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Requests for reprints: Larry J. Schaaf, Clinical Treatment Unit, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1248 James Cancer Hospital, 300 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210. Phone: 614-293-6851; Fax: 614-293-3457; E-mail: larry.schaaf{at}osumc.edu.

Purpose: To determine the recommended starting doses and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in cancer patients with impaired liver function treated on a weekly schedule.

Experimental Design: Patients with solid tumors who had impaired liver function were enrolled into four groups based on baseline serum total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT): Group 1 (n = 19): total bilirubin 1.5 to 3.0 x institutional upper limit of normal (IULN) and ALT/AST ≤5.0 x IULN; Group 2 (n = 7): total bilirubin 3.1 to 5.0 x IULN and ALT/AST ≤5.0 x IULN; Group 3 (n = 6): total bilirubin ≤1.5 x IULN and ALT/AST 5.1 to 20.0 x IULN; Group 4 (n = 10): total bilirubin 1.5 to 3.0 x IULN and ALT/AST 5.1 to 20.0 x IULN. Irinotecan was given as a 90-minute i.v. infusion weekly for the first 4 weeks in each 6-week cycle at starting doses which escalated from 40 to as much as 75 mg/m2. After the first treatment, doses were adjusted based on individual patient toxicities. Starting doses for patients with hepatic dysfunction were derived from the maximum tolerated doses noted in the four hepatic dysfunction groups.

Results: Forty-two patients were treated. Among the most frequent adverse events were neutropenia (41%, grades 3/4), diarrhea (15%, grades 3/4), nausea (10%, grade 3), and vomiting (5%, grades 3/4). Two patients died from drug-induced neutropenic sepsis. Two patients had objective tumor responses (complete response, liver metastases from unknown primary; partial response, colon cancer). Hepatic dysfunction reduced irinotecan clearance while increasing relative exposure to the active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). SN-38 exposures in patients receiving doses of 40 to 75 mg/m2 were comparable to exposures in patients with normal liver function treated with a starting dose of 125 mg/m2.

Conclusions: Irinotecan starting doses that seem to be safe for hepatically impaired patients treated with the weekly schedule are 60, 50, 60, and 40 mg/m2 for groups 1 to 4, respectively. At these starting doses, exposure to SN-38 and the adverse event profile are similar to that observed in patients with normal liver function and antitumor activity can be observed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C.-H. Kohne, G. Folprecht, R. M. Goldberg, E. Mitry, and P. Rougier
Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 390 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
Y. Fujiwara, I. Sekine, Y. Ohe, H. Kunitoh, N. Yamamoto, H. Nokihara, Y. Simmyo, T. Fukui, K. Yamada, and T. Tamura
Serum Total Bilirubin as a Predictive Factor for Severe Neutropenia in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin and Irinotecan
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 30, 2007; (2007) hym033v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.