Clinical Cancer Research Targets Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kote-Jarai, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Eeles, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kote-Jarai, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Eeles, R.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 3896-3901, July 1, 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Human Cancer Biology

Accurate Prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Heterozygous Genotype Using Expression Profiling after Induced DNA Damage

Zsofia Kote-Jarai1, Lucy Matthews2, Ana Osorio1,4, Susan Shanley1,5, Ian Giddings2, Francois Moreews2, Imogen Locke1,5, D. Gareth Evans6, Diana Eccles7 The Carrier Clinic Collaborators5, Richard D. Williams3, Mark Girolami8, Colin Campbell9, Ros Eeles1,5

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Translational Cancer Genetics Team and Sections of 2 Molecular Carcinogenesis and 3 Paediatric Oncology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom; 4 Department of Human Genetics, Spanish National Cancer Centre, Madrid, Spain; 5 Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 6 St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; 7 Clinical Genetics, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; 8 Department of Computing Science, Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and 9 Computational Intelligence Group, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Translational Cancer Research Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG United Kingdom. Phone: 44-208-661-3105; E-mail: zsofia.kote-jarai{at}icr.ac.uk.

Purpose: In this study, the differential gene expression changes following radiation-induced DNA damage in healthy cells from BRCA1/BRCA1 mutation carriers have been compared with controls using high-density microarray technology. We aimed to establish if BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers could be distinguished from noncarriers based on expression profiling of normal cells.

Experimental Design: Short-term primary fibroblast cultures were established from skin biopsies from 10 BRCA1 and 10 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 10 controls, all of whom had previously had breast cancer. The cells were subjected to 15 Gy ionizing irradiation to induce DNA damage. RNA was extracted from all cell cultures, preirradiation and at 1 hour postirradiation. For expression profiling, 15 K spotted cDNA microarrays manufactured by the Cancer Research UK DNA Microarray Facility were used. Statistical feature selection was used with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to determine the best feature set for predicting BRCA1 or BRCA2 heterozygous genotype. To investigate prediction accuracy, a nonprobabilistic classifier (SVM) and a probabilistic Gaussian process classifier were used.

Results: In the task of distinguishing BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from noncarriers and from each other following radiation-induced DNA damage, the SVM achieved 90%, and the Gaussian process classifier achieved 100% accuracy. This effect could not be achieved without irradiation. In addition, the SVM identified a set of BRCA genotype predictor genes.

Conclusions: We conclude that after irradiation-induced DNA damage, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier cells have a distinctive expression phenotype, and this may have a future role in predicting genotypes, with application to clinical detection and classification of mutations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Russo, G. A. Balogh, I. H. Russo, and and the Fox Chase Cancer Center Hospital Network P
Full-term Pregnancy Induces a Specific Genomic Signature in the Human Breast
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 51 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
N. Lama and M. Girolami
vbmp: Variational Bayesian Multinomial Probit Regression for multi-class classification in R
Bioinformatics, January 1, 2008; 24(1): 135 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
F. Meric-Bernstam
Heterogenic Loss of BRCA in Breast Cancer: The "Two-Hit" Hypothesis Takes a Hit
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2428 - 2429.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. Fliser, J. Novak, V. Thongboonkerd, A. Argiles, V. Jankowski, M. A. Girolami, J. Jankowski, and H. Mischak
Advances in Urinary Proteome Analysis and Biomarker Discovery
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1057 - 1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.