This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saldanha, G. Articles by Pringle, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saldanha, G. Articles by Pringle, J. H.

Cutaneous Melanoma Subtypes Show Different BRAF and NRAS Mutation Frequencies

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester and ² Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Gerald Saldanha, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, Level 3 RK-CSB, Leicester LE2 7LX, United Kingdom. Fax: 44-116-252-3274; E-mail: gss4{at}le.ac.uk.

Purpose: BRAF mutations are present in two thirds of cutaneous melanomas and many of the rest have NRAS mutations. However, cutaneous melanoma is a heterogeneous disease with many clinicopathologic subtypes. Of these, the majority fits into four categories: superficial spreading, nodular, lentigo maligna, and acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM). Thus far, there is very limited data combining BRAF and NRAS mutation analysis to explore differences between cutaneous melanoma subtypes. The aim of this study was to address this issue.

Experimental Design: The frequency of BRAF and NRAS hotspot mutations, in exons 15 and 2, respectively, was assessed in 59 cutaneous melanomas comprising superficial spreading, nodular, lentigo maligna, and ALM using single-strand conformational polymorphism and RFLP-PCR analysis.

Results: Only 2 of 21 (9.5%) ALM showed BRAF exon 15 mutation compared with 9 of 14 (64.3%) superficial spreading malignant melanomas, 4 of 11 (36.4%) nodular melanomas, and 7 of 13 (53.4%) lentigo maligna melanomas (P < 0.01). However, our key finding is that the combined analysis of BRAF exon 15 and NRAS exon 2 showed that there were no significant differences in the overall mutation frequency between subtypes. In particular, 9 of 19 (47.4%) ALM without BRAF exon 15 mutation had an NRAS exon 2 mutation.

Conclusions: We show that the overall BRAF/NRAS frequency in mutation hotspots is not significantly different among cutaneous melanoma subtypes. These data show that mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation may be important in all major subtypes of cutaneous melanoma, although the mechanism by which this is achieved varies.