
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Radiation Oncology, 2 Experimental Diagnostic Imaging, 3 Radiation Physics, 4 Imaging Physics, and 5 GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Requests for reprints: K.S. Clifford Chao, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-563-2300; Fax: 713-563-2368; E-mail: cchao{at}mdanderson.org.
Purpose: Early identification of esophageal cancer patients who are responding or resistant to combined chemoradiotherapy may lead to individualized therapeutic approaches and improved clinical outcomes. We assessed the ability of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography (FLT-PET) to detect early changes in tumor proliferation after chemoradiotherapy in experimental models of esophageal carcinoma.
Experimental Design: The in vitro and ex vivo tumor uptake of [3H]FLT in SEG-1 human esophageal adenocarcinoma cells were studied at various early time points after docetaxel plus irradiation and validated with conventional assessments of cellular proliferation [thymidine (Thd) and Ki-67] and [18F]FLT micro-PET imaging. Imaging-histologic correlation was determined by comparing spatial Ki-67 and [18F]FLT distribution in autoradiographs. Comparison with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was done in all experiments.
Results: In vitro [3H]FLT and [3H]Thd uptake rapidly decreased in SEG-1 cells 24 hours after docetaxel with a maximal reduction of over 5-fold (P = 0.005). The [3H]FLT tumor-to-muscle uptake ratio in xenografts declined by 75% compared with baseline (P < 0.005) by 2 days after chemoradiotherapy, despite the lack of change in tumor size. In contrast, the decline of [3H]FDG uptake was gradual and less pronounced. Tumor uptake of [3H]FLT was more closely correlated with Ki-67 expression (r = 0.89, P < 0.001) than was [3H]FDG (r = 0.39, P = 0.08). Micro-PET images depicted similar trends in reduction of [18F]FLT and [18F]FDG tumor uptake. Autoradiographs displayed spatial correlations between [18F]FLT uptake and histologic Ki-67 distribution in preliminary studies.
Conclusions: FLT-PET is suitable and more specific than FDG-PET for depicting early reductions in tumor proliferation that precede tumor size changes after chemoradiotherapy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Brepoels, S. Stroobants, G. Verhoef, T. De Groot, L. Mortelmans, and C. De Wolf-Peeters 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT Uptake Early After Cyclophosphamide and mTOR Inhibition in an Experimental Lymphoma Model J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1102 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P.S. Dunphy and J. S. Lewis Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 106S - 121S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-J. CHANG, Y.-J. CHANG, T.-Y. HO, C.-Y. HSIANG, C.-Y. YU, T.-W. LEE, W.-J. LIN, and C.-H. CHANG Noninvasive Bioluminescent and MicroPET Imaging for the Regulation of NF-{kappa}B in Human Hepatoma-bearing Mice Anticancer Res, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 987 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Murayama, N. Harada, T. Kakiuchi, D. Fukumoto, A. Kamijo, A. T. Kawaguchi, and H. Tsukada Evaluation of D-18F-FMT, 18F-FDG, L-11C-MET, and 18F-FLT for Monitoring the Response of Tumors to Radiotherapy in Mice J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 290 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Sohn, Y.-J. Yang, J.-S. Ryu, S. J. Oh, K. C. Im, D. H. Moon, D. H. Lee, C. Suh, J.-S. Lee, and S.-W. Kim [18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography before and 7 Days after Gefitinib Treatment Predicts Response in Patients with Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7423 - 7429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Riesterer, L. Milas, and K. K. Ang Use of Molecular Biomarkers for Predicting the Response to Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4075 - 4083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |