
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; 2 Department of Medicine, Ryhov Regional Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden; 3 Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; and 4 Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
Requests for reprints: Karin Jirström, Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden. Phone: 46-40-333088; Fax: 46-40-337063; E-mail: karin.jirstrom{at}med.lu.se.
Purpose: Tamoxifen has long been the drug of choice in adjuvant endocrine therapy of steroid hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, and it still remains important due to its well-documented beneficial effect. Hormone receptor status is often reported as "positive" or "negative" using 10% positive nuclei as a cutoff. In this study, we aimed to assess whether a further subclassification of hormone receptor status could enhance the treatment predictive value.
Experimental Design: The immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was quantified in tissue microarrays with tumors from 500 premenopausal breast cancer patients previously included in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen compared with an untreated control group.
Results: Our findings show a gradually increasing tamoxifen effect in tumors with >10% ER-positive nuclei. However, when analyzing tamoxifen response according to various PR fractions, we found that it was primarily patients with tumors showing >75% PR-positive nuclei that responded to tamoxifen treatment, with an improved recurrence-free [relative risk, 0.42 (0.25-0.70); P = 0.001] as well as overall [relative risk, 0.49 (0.28-0.84); P = 0.010] survival.
Conclusions: Adjuvant tamoxifen improved recurrence-free and overall survival for premenopausal patients with tumors showing >75% PR-positive nuclei. No effect could be shown in tumors with fewer PR-positive nuclei. The PR was a stronger predictor of treatment response than the ER. Based on these findings, we suggest the implementation of a fractioned rather than dichotomized immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptors in clinical practice, possibly with greater emphasis on the PR than the ER.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Chen, O. Nalcioglu, and M. Y. Su MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter? Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1024 - 1026. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bicaku, D. C. Marchion, M. L. Schmitt, and P. N. Munster Selective Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 2 Silences Progesterone Receptor-Mediated Signaling Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1513 - 1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Rakha, M. E. El-Sayed, A. R. Green, E. C. Paish, D. G. Powe, J. Gee, R. I. Nicholson, A. H.S. Lee, J. F.R. Robertson, and I. O. Ellis Biologic and Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer With Single Hormone Receptor Positive Phenotype J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4772 - 4778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bartsch, C. Wenzel, G. Altorjai, U. Pluschnig, R. M. Mader, M. Gnant, R. Jakesz, M. Rudas, C. C. Zielinski, and G. G. Steger Her2 and Progesterone Receptor Status Are Not Predictive of Response to Fulvestrant Treatment Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4435 - 4439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. V. Dimitrov, P. Colucci, and S. Nagpal Some Aspects of the Endocrine Profile and Management of Hormone-Dependent Male Breast Cancer Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 798 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Mauriac, A Keshaviah, M Debled, H Mouridsen, J. Forbes, B Thurlimann, R Paridaens, A Monnier, I Lang, A Wardley, et al. Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the BIG 1-98 trial Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 859 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |