
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Review |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida and 2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Kenneth C. Anderson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Mayer 557, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-632-2144; Fax: 617-632-2140; E-mail: Kenneth_Anderson{at}dfci.harvard.edu.
Purpose: With the identification of new molecular targets and pathways, many new therapeutic approaches are being identified for potential application in the treatment of multiple myeloma. New chemical compounds and biologics have been developed against molecular targets with substantial scientific evidence that these targets are involved in myeloma development, progression, or relapse. To safely and rapidly bring these advances to bear on the disease, new preclinical models in cells and animals need to be established, as well as prioritization and standardization in current preclinical and clinical validation. An experts' roundtable was convened in November 2005 to discuss shortcomings in current preclinical models and discuss what models are needed to best validate therapeutics and combinations of therapies for multiple myeloma.
Conclusions: This exciting event brought together experts in compound validation, preclinical development, and experts in multiple myeloma from academic institutions and the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The goals were to evaluate an algorithm for therapeutic validation and discuss in vitro modeling for target discovery, animal models for preclinical development, and models for testing drug combinations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Rozemuller, E. van der Spek, L. H. Bogers-Boer, M. C. Zwart, V. Verweij, M. Emmelot, R. W. Groen, R. Spaapen, A. C. Bloem, H. M. Lokhorst, et al. A bioluminescence imaging based in vivo model for preclinical testing of novel cellular immunotherapy strategies to improve the graft-versus-myeloma effect Haematologica, July 1, 2008; 93(7): 1049 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yang, V. MacLeod, Y. Dai, Y. Khotskaya-Sample, Z. Shriver, G. Venkataraman, R. Sasisekharan, A. Naggi, G. Torri, B. Casu, et al. The syndecan-1 heparan sulfate proteoglycan is a viable target for myeloma therapy Blood, September 15, 2007; 110(6): 2041 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |