Clinical Cancer Research AACR Conference on Cancer Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivier, M.
Right arrow Articles by Børresen-Dale, A.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivier, M.
Right arrow Articles by Børresen-Dale, A.-L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 1157-1167, February 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

The Clinical Value of Somatic TP53 Gene Mutations in 1,794 Patients with Breast Cancer

Magali Olivier1, Anita Langerød2, Patrizia Carrieri3, Jonas Bergh4, Sigrid Klaar4, Jorunn Eyfjord5, Charles Theillet6, Carmen Rodriguez6, Rosette Lidereau7, Ivan Bièche7, Jennifer Varley8, Yves Bignon9, Nancy Uhrhammer9, Robert Winqvist10, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen11, Dieter Niederacher12, Shunsuke Kato13, Chikashi Ishioka13, Pierre Hainaut1 and Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale2

Authors' Affiliations: 1 IARC, Lyon, France; 2 Department of Genetics, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, and Faculty Division, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; 3 INSERM U379, ORS PACA, Epidémiologie Sociale Appliquée à l'Innovation, Marseille, France; 4 Department of Oncology (Radiumhemmet), Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; 5 The Icelandic Cancer Society, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Laboratory, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; 6 INSERM E 229, CRLC Val d'Aurelle/Paul Lamarque, Montpellier Cedex, France; 7 INSERM U735/Oncogénétique, Centre René Huguenin, St. Cloud, France; 8 Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, United Kingdom; 9 Department of Oncogenetics, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France; Departments of 10 Clinical Genetics and 11 Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; 12 Molekulargenetisches Labor, Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Düsseldorf, Gebäude, Düsseldorf, Germany; and 13 Department of Clinical Oncology, Institute of Development Aging and Cancer, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan

Requests for reprints: Pierre Hainaut, IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, F-69372 Lyon, France. Phone: 33-472-738-532; Fax: 33-472-738-322; E-mail: hainaut{at}iarc.fr.

To investigate the clinical value of somatic TP53 mutations in breast cancer, we assembled clinical and molecular data on 1,794 women with primary breast cancer with long-term follow-up and whose tumor has been screened for mutation in exons 5 to 8 of TP53 by gene sequencing. TP53 mutations were more frequent in tumors of ductal and medullar types, aggressive phenotype (high grade, large size, node positive cases, and low hormone receptor content) and in women <60 years old. TP53 mutations within exons 5 to 8 conferred an elevated risk of breast cancer–specific death of 2.27 (relative risk >10 years; P < 0.0001) compared with patients with no such mutation. The prognostic value of TP53 mutation was independent of tumor size, node status, and hormone receptor content, confirming and reconciling previous findings in smaller series. Moreover, an interaction between TP53 mutation and progesterone receptor (PR) status was revealed, TP53 mutation combined with the absence of progesterone receptor being associated with the worst prognosis. Whereas previous studies have emphasized the fact that missense mutations in the DNA-binding motifs have a worse prognosis than missense mutations outside these motifs, we show that non–missense mutations have prognostic value similar to missense mutations in DNA-binding motifs. Nonetheless, specific missense mutants (codon 179 and R248W) seem to be associated with an even worse prognosis. These results, obtained on the largest series analyzed thus far, show that TP53 mutations identified by gene sequencing have an independent prognostic value in breast cancer and could have potential uses in clinical practice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
A. J. Levine and E. Vosburgh
P53 mutations in lymphomas: position matters
Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 2997 - 2998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. H. Young, K. Leroy, M. B. Moller, G. W. B. Colleoni, M. Sanchez-Beato, F. R. Kerbauy, C. Haioun, J. C. Eickhoff, A. H. Young, P. Gaulard, et al.
Structural profiles of TP53 gene mutations predict clinical outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an international collaborative study
Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3088 - 3098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. X. Real
p53: It Has It All, But Will It Make It to the Clinic As a Marker in Bladder Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5341 - 5344.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. George, R. H. Datar, L. Wu, J. Cai, N. Patten, S. J. Beil, S. Groshen, J. Stein, D. Skinner, P. A. Jones, et al.
p53 Gene and Protein Status: The Role of p53 Alterations in Predicting Outcome in Patients With Bladder Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5352 - 5358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5287 - 5312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
U. Cardellino, Y. Ciribilli, V. Andreotti, P. Modesto, P. Menichini, G. Fronza, C. Pellegrino, and A. Inga
Transcriptional properties of feline p53 and its tumour-associated mutants: a yeast-based approach
Mutagenesis, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. R. Grossman, S. Lyle, M. B. Resnick, E. Sabo, R. T. Lis, E. Rosinha, Q. Liu, C.-C. Hsieh, G. Bhat, A. R. Frackelton Jr., et al.
p66 Shc Tumor Levels Show a Strong Prognostic Correlation with Disease Outcome in Stage IIA Colon Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5798 - 5804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Lonning, S Knappskog, V Staalesen, R Chrisanthar, and J. Lillehaug
Breast cancer prognostication and prediction in the postgenomic era
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1293 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L. R. Dearth, H. Qian, T. Wang, T. E. Baroni, J. Zeng, S. W. Chen, S. Y. Yi, and R. K. Brachmann
Inactive full-length p53 mutants lacking dominant wild-type p53 inhibition highlight loss of heterozygosity as an important aspect of p53 status in human cancers
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 289 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. A. Klein
Random mutations, selected mutations: A PIN opens the door to new genetic landscapes
PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18033 - 18034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. C. Joerger, H. C. Ang, and A. R. Fersht
From the Cover: Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs
PNAS, October 10, 2006; 103(41): 15056 - 15061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.