This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lyall, M. S. Articles by Murray, G. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lyall, M. S. Articles by Murray, G. I.

Profiling Markers of Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

Authors' Affiliation: Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Graeme I. Murray, Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1224-553794; Fax: 44-1224-663002; E-mail: g.i.murray{at}abdn.ac.uk.

Purpose: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer in developed nations and the incidence of this disease is increasing. There is a need to further stratify prognostically distinct groups of colorectal cancer, and the purpose of this study was to identify prognostically significant immunohistochemical marker profiles in colorectal cancer.

Experimental Design: In this study, a range (n = 23) of markers [pRb, p16, p21, p27, p53, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, cyclin D1, bcl-2, epidermal growth factor receptor, C-erb-B2, topoisomerase-I, liver fatty acid–binding protein, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 1-3, 7, 9, and 13, MT1-MMP, MT2-MMP, and tissue inhibitors of MMP 1-3] of putative prognostic significance have been investigated by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, wax-embedded sections in a series (n = 90) of stage III (Dukes C) colorectal cancers. An immunohistochemical score based on the intensity of immunoreactivity and, where relevant, the proportion of immunoreactive cells was established for each marker.

Results: Unsupervised two-dimensional hierarchical cluster analysis identified three distinct cluster groups (designated groups 1-3) with different marker profiles. There were significant survival differences between groups 1 and 2 (log rank = 11.48; P = 0.0007) and between groups 1 and 3 (log rank = 8.32; P = 0.0039). Multivariate analysis showed that the complete marker profile was independently the most significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.48; P = 0.004).

Conclusions: This study has identified an immunohistochemical marker profile of colorectal cancer and showed that it is an independent indicator of prognosis in this type of cancer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I Zlobec and A Lugli Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2008; 84(994): 403 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Zlobec and A Lugli Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 561 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Varghese, M. Burness, H. Xu, T. Beresnev, J. Pingpank, and H. R. Alexander Site-Specific Gene Expression Profiles and Novel Molecular Prognostic Factors in Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Diffusely Metastatic to Liver or Peritoneum Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3460 - 3471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Xu, F. Wang, M. Di, Q. Huang, M. Wang, H. Hu, Y. Jin, J. Dong, and M. Lai Classification Based on the Combination of Molecular and Pathologic Predictors is Superior to Molecular Classification on Prognosis in Colorectal Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5082 - 5088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]