Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar AACR Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 1721-1727, March 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Reproducibility of Gene Expression Signature–Based Predictions in Replicate Experiments

Keith Anderson2, Kenneth R. Hess2, Mini Kapoor3, Stephen Tirrell6, Jean Courtemanche6, Bailiang Wang4, Yun Wu5, Yun Gong5, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi1, W. Fraser Symmans5 and Lajos Pusztai1,4

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Breast Medical Oncology, 2 Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, 3 Cancer Genetics, 4 Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, and 5 Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and 6 Transcriptional Profiling Core Facility of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Lajos Pusztai, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1354, P.O. Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230-1439. Phone: 713-792-2817; Fax: 713-794-4385; E-mail: lpusztai{at}mdanderson.org.

Purpose: The goals of this analysis were to (a) determine concordance of gene expression results from replicate experiments, (b) examine prediction agreement of multigene predictors on replicate data, and (c) assess the robustness of prediction results in the face of noise.

Patients and Methods: Affymetrix U133A gene chips were used for gene expression profiling of 97 fine-needle aspiration biopsies from breast cancer. Thirty-five cases were profiled in replicates: 17 within the same laboratory, 11 in two different laboratories, and 15 to assess manual and robotic labeling. We used data from 62 cases to develop 111 distinct pharmacogenomic predictors of response to therapy. These were tested on cases profiled in duplicates to determine prediction agreement and accuracy. To evaluate the robustness of the pharmacogenomic predictors, we also introduced random noise into the informative genes in one half of the replicates.

Results: The average concordance correlation coefficient was 0.978 (range, 0.96-0.99) for intralaboratory replicates, 0.962 (range, 0.94-0.98) for between-laboratory replicates, and 0.971 (range, 0.93-0.99) for manual versus robotic labeling. The mean % prediction agreement on replicate data was 97% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98; SD, 0.006), 92% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93; SD, 0.009), and 94% (95% CI, 0.92-0.95; SD, 0.008) for support vector machines, diagonal linear discriminant analysis, and k-nearest neighbor prediction methods, respectively. Mean accuracy in the test set was 77% (95% CI, 0.74-0.79; SD, 0.014), 66% (95% CI, 0.63-0.73; SD, 0.015), and 64% (95% CI, 0.60-0.67; SD, 0.016), respectively.

Conclusion: Gene expression results obtained with Affymetrix U133A chips are highly reproducible within and across two high-volume laboratories. Pharmacogenomic predictions yielded >90% agreement in replicate data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. K.T. Tan, L. K. Tan, K. Yu, P. H. Tan, M. Lee, L. H. Sii, C. Y. Wong, G. H. Ho, A. W.Y. Yeo, P. K.H. Chow, et al.
Clinical Validation of a Customized Multiple Signature Microarray for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 461 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Pusztai, K. Anderson, and K. R. Hess
Pharmacogenomic Predictor Discovery in Phase II Clinical Trials for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6080 - 6086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Peintinger, K. Anderson, C. Mazouni, H. M. Kuerer, C. Hatzis, F. Lin, G. N. Hortobagyi, W. F. Symmans, and L. Pusztai
Thirty-Gene Pharmacogenomic Test Correlates with Residual Cancer Burden after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4078 - 4082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Pusztai
Chips to Bedside: Incorporation of Microarray Data into Clinical Practice
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7209 - 7214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. Pusztai, C. Mazouni, K. Anderson, Y. Wu, and W. F. Symmans
Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer: Limitations and Potential
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 868 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.