This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Uemura, H. Articles by Itoh, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Uemura, H. Articles by Itoh, K.

A Phase I Trial of Vaccination of CA9-Derived Peptides for HLA-A24-Positive Patients with Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Department of Urology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; ² Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan; ³ Second Department of Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan; and ⁴ Department of Immunology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan

Requests for reprints: Hirotsugu Uemura, Department of Urology, Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2, Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan. Phone: 81-72-366-0221; Fax: 81-72-365-6273; E-mail: huemura{at}med.kindai.ac.jp.

Purpose: A phase I peptide vaccination trial was done in patients with progressive cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to assess both the toxicity and capability to induce immune responses of three peptides (CA9p219-227, p288-296, and p323-331) derived from CA9, a tumor-associated antigen ubiquitously expressed in RCC.

Experimental Design: Twenty-three patients positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24 with histologically confirmed RCC were enrolled. Eligibility included progressive disease after standard cytokine therapy with interleukin-2 and/or IFN-. Patients were vaccinated s.c. with the three peptides emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant at 2-week intervals. Pre- and post-vaccination blood samples were obtained for toxicity assessment and immunologic studies. Patients were monitored for clinical responses on a 3-monthly basis.

Results: Vaccinations were well tolerated without any major adverse event. Most of the patients developed peptide-specific CTLs and/or immunoglobulin G reactive to the peptides after the 6th or 9th vaccination, followed by a gradual increase in both CTL frequency and levels of peptide-reactive serum IgG. Three patients with multiple lung metastases showed partial responses with disappearance and shrinking of metastatic lesions. Additionally, stable disease for >6 months was observed in six patients (median duration, 12.2 months). Moreover, the median survival time of all patients who were progressive at trial enrollment after failing immunotherapy was 21.0 months (5-35 months).

Conclusions: These results suggest that vaccination of these peptides is safe and recommended for further trials for HLA-A24-positive metastatic RCC patients.