
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Innovations and Challenges in Melanoma |
Authors' Affiliation: Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
Requests for reprints: Ulrich Keilholz, Charity, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Medicine III, Free University Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany. Phone: 49-30-8445-3906; Fax: 49-30-8445-4021; E-mail: Ulrich.keilholz{at}charite.de.
Monitoring cellular immune responses is one prerequisite for rational development of cancer vaccines. The primary objective of immune monitoring is to determine the efficacy of a vaccine to induce or augment a specific T-cell response. Further questions relate to the prevalence and functional relevance of spontaneous tumor-directed immune responses, the functional characteristics of T-cell responses, and, finally and most importantly, the relationship between immune monitoring assay results and clinical end points. The issue of T-cell monitoring has become more complex as different types and generations of assays have been adopted during the past decade and both standardization and validation of assays have often been insufficient. Because the development of assays parallel the clinical development of cancer vaccines, technical advances have been achieved simultaneously with broadening understanding of cancer immunity. Suitable animal models for immune monitoring are, however, lacking, because preclinical vaccine development in rodents does not allow serial immune monitoring of the peripheral blood, as is commonly used in patients. The current situation is characterized by a lack of universal standards for T-cell assessment, uncertainty about the association between immune monitoring assay results and clinical antitumor end points, and lack of knowledge regarding the contribution of different aspects of T-cell function to clinical efficacy. It is acknowledged that T-cell monitoring will have to be validated in large trials with clinically effective vaccines, but this necessity should not discourage the current application of novel assays within clinical trials of all stages.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Stojadinovic, E. A. Mittendorf, J. P. Holmes, A. Amin, M. T. Hueman, S. Ponniah, and G. E. Peoples Quantification and Phenotypic Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells for Monitoring Response to a Preventive HER2/neu Vaccine-Based Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 14(12): 3359 - 3368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Abdalla, L. Hansson, I. Eriksson, B. Nasman-Glaser, E. D. Rossmann, H. Rabbani, H. Mellstedt, and A. Osterborg Idiotype protein vaccination in combination with adjuvant cytokines in patients with multiple myeloma - evaluation of T-cell responses by different read-out systems Haematologica, January 1, 2007; 92(1): 110 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |