Clinical Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callagy, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Caldas, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callagy, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Caldas, C.
Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 2468-2475, April 15, 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Bcl-2 Is a Prognostic Marker in Breast Cancer Independently of the Nottingham Prognostic Index

Grace M. Callagy1,4, Paul D. Pharoah2, Sarah E. Pinder1,3, Forrest D. Hsu5, Torsten O. Nielsen5, Joseph Ragaz7, Ian O. Ellis6, David Huntsman5 and Carlos Caldas1

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, Hutchison-Medical Research Council Research Centre, University of Cambridge; 2 Cancer Research UK, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory; 3 Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 4 Department of Pathology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; 5 Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre of the Department of Pathology and Prostate Research Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 6 Department of Histopathology, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and 7 Oncology Health Center, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Requests for reprints: Carlos Caldas, Department of Oncology, Hutchison-Medical Research Council Research Centre, Level 3, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1223-331989; Fax: 44-1223-331753; E-mail: cc234{at}cam.ac.uk.

Purpose: Prognostication of breast cancer using clinicopathologic variables, although useful, remains imperfect. Many reports suggest that gene expression profiling can refine the current approach. Alternatively, it has been shown that panels of proteins assessed by immunohistochemistry might also be useful in this regard. We evaluate the prognostic potential of a panel of markers by immunohistochemistry in a large case series to establish if either a single marker or a panel could improve the prognostic power of the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). We validated the results in an independent series.

Experimental Design and Results: The expression of 13 biomarkers was evaluated in 930 breast cancers on a tissue microarray. Eight markers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Bcl-2, cyclin E, p53, MIB-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and HER2] showed a significant association with survival at 10 years on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis that included these eight markers and the NPI, only the NPI [hazard ratio (HR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-1.56; P = 0.0005], ER (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88; P = 0.011), and Bcl-2 (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99; P = 0.055) were significant. In a subsequent multivariate analysis that included the NPI, ER, and Bcl-2, only Bcl-2 (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P = 0.006) remained independent of NPI (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.16-1.56; P = 0.004). In addition, Bcl-2, used as a single marker, was more powerful than the use of a panel of markers. Based on these results, an independent series was used to validate the prognostic significance of Bcl-2. ER and PR were also evaluated in this validation series. Bcl-2 (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = 0.018) retained prognostic significance independent of the NPI (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67-2.51; P < 0.001) with an effect that was maximal in the first 5 years.

Conclusion: Bcl-2 is an independent predictor of breast cancer outcome and seems to be useful as a prognostic adjunct to the NPI, particularly in the first 5 years after diagnosis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. S.-Y. Foo, Y.-J. Nam, M. J. Ostreicher, M. D. Metzl, R. S. Whelan, C.-F. Peng, A. W. Ashton, W. Fu, K. Mani, S.-F. Chin, et al.
Regulation of p53 tetramerization and nuclear export by ARC
PNAS, December 26, 2007; 104(52): 20826 - 20831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. S. Bachmann, F. Otterbach, R. Callies, H. Nuckel, M. Bau, K. W. Schmid, W. Siffert, and R. Kimmig
The AA Genotype of the Regulatory BCL2 Promoter Polymorphism ( 938C>A) Is Associated with a Favorable Outcome in Lymph Node Negative Invasive Breast Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5790 - 5797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
F. Bertucci, D. Birnbaum, and A. Goncalves
Proteomics of Breast Cancer: Principles and Potential Clinical Applications
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1772 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.