
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria and 2 Institute for Pathology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Requests for reprints: Alain G. Zeimet, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Phone: 43-512-504-23051; Fax: 43-512-504-23055; E-mail: alain.zeimet{at}uibk.ac.at.
Purpose: The major obstacle in treating ovarian cancer is the rapid development of platinum resistance during therapy. Deregulation of members of the E2F family of transcription factors is crucially involved in carcinogenesis and probably in mechanisms underlying platinum resistance. We therefore investigated the relevance of the whole set of E2F family members in predicting clinical outcome and their significance in predicting platinum resistance.
Experimental Design: Real-time PCR of all E2F family members was done from 77 ovarian carcinomas, defined as our training set, and 8 healthy control samples. The correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics, platinum resistance, and survival was investigated. Furthermore, the cross-talk of E2F family members was assessed for its value in predicting survival and platinum resistance.
Results: The proliferation-promoting E2F1 and E2F2 were associated with grade 3 tumors and residual disease >2 cm in diameter after initial surgery. Survival analyses showed low expression of E2F1 or E2F2 to be significantly associated with favorable disease-free and overall survival (E2F1, P = 0.039 and 0.047, respectively; E2F2, P = 0.009 and 0.006, respectively). In contrast, high expression of inhibiting E2F4 or E2F7 predicted favorable disease-free and overall survival (E2F4, P = 0.047 and 0.042, respectively; E2F7, P = 0.048 and 0.042, respectively). A high E2F2 to E2F4 ratio was the most valuable prognostic variable for disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.494; P = 0.002). Tumors considered platinum resistant were associated with lower E2F4 and E2F7 expression (P = 0.012 and 0.009, respectively) compared with platinum-sensitive tumors. Again, ratios of E2F1 or E2F2 to E2F7 were the most favorable variables in predicting platinum resistance.
Conclusions: We here show that deregulation of both proliferation-promoting and proliferation-inhibiting E2F transcription factors and their cross-talk is crucially involved in the tumor biology of ovarian cancer and influences clinical outcome. Furthermore, down-regulation of E2F7 may contribute to mechanisms underlying platinum resistance, and calculation of ratios of proliferation-promoting E2F1 to E2F7 could serve as a putative predictor of platinum resistance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Bredhult, L. Sahlin, and M. Olovsson Gene expression analysis of human endometrial endothelial cells exposed to op'-DDT Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 14(2): 97 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Goligorsky How to keep kidneys safe while shrinking tumors: the conundrum of cisplatin action Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F50 - F51. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |