
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical |
Authors' Affiliations: Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research and Departments of 1 Surgery and 2 Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 3 Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
Requests for reprints: Rolf A. Brekken, Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research and Departments of Surgery and Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8593. Phone: 214-648-5151; Fax: 214-648-4940; E-mail: rolf.brekken{at}utsouthwestern.edu.
Purpose: New strategies to detect tumor angiogenesis and monitor response of tumor vasculature to therapy are needed. Contrast ultrasound imaging using microbubbles targeted to tumor endothelium offers a noninvasive method for monitoring and quantifying vascular effects of antitumor therapy. We investigated the use of targeted microbubbles to follow vascular response of therapy in a mouse model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Experimental Design: Microbubbles conjugated to monoclonal antibodies were used to image and quantify vascular effects of two different antitumor therapies in s.c. and orthotopic pancreatic tumors in mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies and/or gemcitabine, and the localization of microbubbles to endoglin (CD105), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), or VEGF-activated blood vessels (the VEGF-VEGFR complex) was monitored by contrast ultrasound.
Results: Targeted microbubbles showed significant enhancement of tumor vasculature when compared with untargeted or control IgGtargeted microbubbles. Video intensity from targeted microbubbles correlated with the level of expression of the target (CD105, VEGFR2, or the VEGF-VEGFR complex) and with microvessel density in tumors under antiangiogenic or cytotoxic therapy.
Conclusions: We conclude that targeted microbubbles represent a novel and attractive tool for noninvasive, vascular-targeted molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis and for monitoring vascular effects specific to antitumor therapy in vivo.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, Z. Cheng, C. Davis, A. M. Lutz, M. L. Schipper, C. H. Nielsen, and S. S. Gambhir Targeted Microbubbles for Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis: Assessment of Whole-Body Biodistribution with Dynamic Micro-PET in Mice Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 212 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Palmowski, J. Huppert, P. Hauff, M. Reinhardt, K. Schreiner, M. A. Socher, P. Hallscheidt, G. W. Kauffmann, W. Semmler, and F. Kiessling Vessel Fractions in Tumor Xenografts Depicted by Flow- or Contrast-Sensitive Three-Dimensional High-Frequency Doppler Ultrasound Respond Differently to Antiangiogenic Treatment Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7042 - 7049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, A. M. Lutz, R. Paulmurugan, M. R. Patel, P. Chu, J. Rosenberg, and S. S. Gambhir Dual-targeted Contrast Agent for US Assessment of Tumor Angiogenesis in Vivo Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 936 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Lee, A. Lyshchik, J. Huamani, D. E. Hallahan, and A. C. Fleischer Relationship Between Retention of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-Targeted Ultrasonographic Contrast Agent and the Level of VEGFR2 Expression in an In Vivo Breast Cancer Model J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 855 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Dineen, K. D. Lynn, S. E. Holloway, A. F. Miller, J. P. Sullivan, D. S. Shames, A. W. Beck, C. C. Barnett, J. B. Fleming, and R. A. Brekken Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Mediates Macrophage Infiltration into Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumors in Mice Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4340 - 4346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cai and X. Chen Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 113S - 128S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Dallas, S. Samuel, L. Xia, F. Fan, M. J. Gray, S. J. Lim, and L. M. Ellis Endoglin (CD105): A Marker of Tumor Vasculature and Potential Target for Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 14(7): 1931 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Kruskal Can Contrast-enhanced US with Targeted Microbubbles Monitor the Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies? Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 339 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, R. Paulmurugan, K. Chen, O. Gheysens, M. Rodriguez-Porcel, A. M. Lutz, I. Y. Chen, X. Chen, and S. S. Gambhir US Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis with Microbubbles Targeted to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 in Mice Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 508 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Palmowski, J. Huppert, G. Ladewig, P. Hauff, M. Reinhardt, M. M. Mueller, E. C. Woenne, J. W. Jenne, M. Maurer, G. W. Kauffmann, et al. Molecular profiling of angiogenesis with targeted ultrasound imaging: early assessment of antiangiogenic therapy effects Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2008; 7(1): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |