This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ross, J. S. Articles by Hortobagyi, G. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ross, J. S. Articles by Hortobagyi, G. N.

Standardizing Slide-Based Assays in Breast Cancer: Hormone Receptors, HER2, and Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, and Divisions of ² Pathology and ³ Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Jeffrey S. Ross, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208. Phone: 518-262-5461; Fax: 518-262-8092; E-mail: rossj{at}mail.amc.edu.

Despite the rapid expansion of novel diagnostics designed to personalize breast cancer care, there remain several significant unmet needs for improving the accuracy and reliability of tests that are already in common daily clinical practice. For example, although immunohistochemistry has been the predominant method for measuring estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status for over 15 years, this assay remains unstandardized and there is a widespread concern that inaccuracy in immunohistochemistry technique and interpretation is leading to an unacceptably high error rate in determining the true hormone receptor status. Similarly, there is considerable concern that both false-negative and false-positive result rates for testing for HER2 status are unacceptably high in current clinical practice. This commentary considers a variety of factors, including preanalytic conditions and slide-scoring procedures, and other variables that may be contributing to current testing error rates and why there is a great need for the standardization of these biomarker assay procedures to further enable the highest possible quality of care for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R A Walker Immunohistochemical markers as predictive tools for breast cancer J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 61(6): 689 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Ross, C. Hatzis, W. F. Symmans, L. Pusztai, and G. N. Hortobagyi Commercialized Multigene Predictors of Clinical Outcome for Breast Cancer Oncologist, May 1, 2008; 13(5): 477 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]