This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stockwin, L. H. Articles by Newton, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stockwin, L. H. Articles by Newton, D. L.

Proteomic Analysis Identifies Oxidative Stress Induction by Adaphostin

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Developmental Therapeutics Program and ² Advanced Biomedical Computing Center, Science Applications International Corporation Frederick, and ³ Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland

Requests for reprints: Dianne L. Newton, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Room 6, Building 320, Frederick, MD 21702. Phone: 301-846-6809; Fax: 301-846-7021; E-mail: dnewton{at}ncifcrf.gov.

Purpose: Activities distinct from inhibition of Bcr/abl have led to adaphostin (NSC 680410) being described as "a drug in search of a mechanism." In this study, proteomic analysis of adaphostin-treated myeloid leukemia cell lines was used to further elucidate a mechanism of action.

Experimental Design: HL60 and K562 cells treated with adaphostin for 6, 12, or 24 h were analyzed using two-dimensional PAGE. Differentially expressed spots were excised, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The contribution of the redox-active hydroquinone group in adaphostin was also examined by carrying out proteomic analysis of HL60 cells treated with a simple hydroquinone (1,4-dihydroxybenzene) or H₂O₂.

Results: Analysis of adaphostin-treated cells identified 49 differentially expressed proteins, the majority being implicated in the response to oxidative stress (e.g., CALM, ERP29, GSTP1, PDIA1) or induction of apoptosis (e.g., LAMA, FLNA, TPR, GDIS). Interestingly, modulation of these proteins was almost fully prevented by inclusion of an antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine. Validation of the proteomic data confirmed GSTP1 as an adaphostin resistance gene. Subsequent analysis of HL60 cells treated with 1,4-dihydroxybenzene or H₂O₂ showed similar increases in intracellular peroxides and an almost identical proteomic profiles to that of adaphostin treatment. Western blotting of a panel of cell lines identified Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) as correlating with adaphostin resistance. The role of SOD as a second adaphostin resistance gene was confirmed by demonstrating that inhibition of SOD using diethyldithiocarbamate increased adaphostin sensitivity, whereas transfection of SOD I attenuated toxicity. Importantly, treatment with 1,4-dihydroxybenzene or H₂O₂ replicated adaphostin-induced Bcr/abl polypeptide degradation, suggesting that kinase inhibition is a ROS-dependent phenomenon.

Conclusion: Adaphostin should be classified as a redox-active–substituted dihydroquinone.