Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 4306-4310, July 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0146
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robson, M.

Cancer Prevention

BRCA Mutations in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In situ

Karen Lisa Smith1, Muriel Adank3, Noah Kauff1,2, Kelly Lafaro1, Jeff Boyd1,2, Johanna B. Lee1, Clifford Hudis1, Kenneth Offit1 and Mark Robson1

Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Medicine and 2 Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, and 3 VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Requests for reprints: Mark Robson, Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 222 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. Phone: 212-434-5129; Fax: 212-434-5166; E-mail: robsonm{at}mskcc.org.

Purpose: The strength of the association between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and BRCA mutations has not been defined.

Experimental Design: Mutation frequency was compared in three groups: (1) a prevalent series of women with DCIS, (2) an incident series of women with DCIS, and (3) a clinic-based series of women with DCIS referred for hereditary cancer risk assessment. In groups 1 and 2, limited to Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) cases, mutation frequency was compared with that in age-matched AJ controls with invasive breast cancer (IBC).

Results: In group 1, 3 of 62 (4.8%) women with DCIS and 15 of 130 (11.5%) controls with IBC had BRCA mutations. In group 2, 0 of 58 (0%) women with DCIS and 6 of 116 (5.2%) controls with IBC had BRCA mutations [combined odds ratios (OR) in groups 1 and 2: 3.64, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.06-12.46; P = 0.04]. In group 3, deleterious mutations were identified in 10 of 79 (12.7%) probands with DCIS, similar to the frequency in IBC probands. In group 3, mutations were associated with family history of ovarian cancer (OR, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.48-71.94; P = 0.003) or early onset breast cancer (OR, 16.23; 95% CI, 1.68-157.01; P = 0.02) but not with AJ ethnicity or age at diagnosis.

Conclusions: BRCA mutations were less frequent in women with DCIS not selected for family history or age at diagnosis than in women with IBC. Nonetheless, mutations were found in a significant proportion of women with DCIS who presented for hereditary risk assessment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.