
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris 13; 2 Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Ile-de-France, UMR INSERM/INRA/CNAM, SMBH Paris 13; 3 Département Interhospitalier de Santé Publique, Hôpital Avicenne, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, Paris; 4 Service d'Histologie Biologie Tumorale, EA 3499 Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, Université Paris 6, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; 5 Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, EA3499 Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; 6 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Département Thoracique; 7 Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique, Paris, France; and 8 Département de Médecine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris
Requests for reprints: Pierre Saintigny, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Avicenne, 125 Route de Stalingrad, 93009 Bobigny, France. Phone: 33-1-48-95-50-32; Fax: 33-1-48-95-50-35/33-1-48-95-50-30; E-mail: pierre.saintigny{at}avc.aphp.fr.
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic effect of erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO receptor (EPO-R) expression in stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Experimental Design: EPO and EPO-R expression in 158 tumor samples from resected stage I NSCLC was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and tissue array technology.
Results: EPO-R and EPO were highly expressed in 20.9% and 35.4% of tumors, respectively. High EPO-R expression compared with negative or low-level expression was associated with a poor 5-year disease-specific survival (60.6% versus 80.8%; P = 0.01, log-rank test). High EPO expression compared with negative and low-level expression was associated with a trend toward a poor 5-year disease-specific survival (69.6% versus 80.4%; P = 0.13, log-rank test). A high level of EPO-R and EPO coexpression was associated with a poor 5-year disease-specific survival compared with other groups of patients (50.0% versus 80.0% survival at the end of follow-up; P = 0.005, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis for disease-specific survival, high-level EPO-R and EPO coexpression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (hazard ratio, 2.214; 95% confidence interval, 1.012-4.848; P = 0.046).
Conclusion: These results establish the pejorative prognostic value of EPO and EPO-R expression in early-stage resected NSCLC and suggest a potential paracrine and/or autocrine role of endogenous EPO in NSCLC aggressiveness.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri Unraveling the Mystery of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Cancer Promotion Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4013 - 4017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yoon, N. Agarwal, and J. T. Prchal Does Erythropoietin Promote Tumor Growth? Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1920 - 1920. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri Role of Erythropoietin-stimulating Agents in the Outcomes of Patients with Cancer ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 140 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |