
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Therapy: Clinical |
Authors' Affiliations: 1 Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, Texas; 2 Medicine Branch at Navy, National Naval Medical Center, National Cancer Institute; 3 Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Centers, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 4 Department of Global Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Sanofi-Aventis, Malvern; Pennsylvania; 5 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; 6 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 7 New York University, New York, New York; 8 Montifiore Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; 9 Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 10 City of Hope, Duarte, California; and 11 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Requests for reprints: Chris H. Takimoto, Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, 14960 Omicron Drive, San Antonio, TX 78245-3217. Phone: 210-450-3800; Fax: 210-677-0058; E-mail: ctakimot{at}idd.org.
Purpose: To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxaliplatin in cancer patients with impaired renal function.
Experimental Design: Thirty-four patients were stratified by 24-h urinary creatinine clearance (CrCL) into four renal dysfunction groups: group A (control, CrCL,
60 mL/min), B (mild, CrCL, 40-59 mL/min), C (moderate, CrCL, 20-39 mL/min), and D (severe, CrCL, <20 mL/min). Patients were treated with 60 to 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin infused over 2 h every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic monitoring of platinum in plasma, plasma ultrafiltrates, and urine was done during cycles 1 and 2.
Results: Plasma ultrafiltrate platinum clearance strongly correlated with CrCL (r2 = 0.712). Platinum elimination from plasma was triphasic, and maximal platinum concentrations (Cmax) were consistent across all renal impairment groups. However, only the ß-half-life was significantly prolonged by renal impairment, with values of 14.0 ± 4.3, 20.3 ± 17.7, 29.2 ± 29.6, and 68.1 h in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = 0.002). At a dose level of 130 mg/m2, the area under the concentration time curve increased in with the degree of renal impairment, with values of 16.4 ± 5.03, 39.7 ± 11.5, and 44.6 ± 14.6 µg·h/mL, in groups A, B, and C, respectively. However, there was no increase in pharmacodynamic drug-related toxicities. Estimated CrCL using the Cockcroft-Gault method approximated the measured 24-h urinary CrCL (mean prediction error, –5.0 mL/min).
Conclusions: Oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics are altered in patients with renal impairment, but a corresponding increase in oxaliplatin-related toxicities is not observed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Chen, D. Jonker, I. Gauthier, M. MacLean, J. Wells, J. Powers, and L. Seymour Phase I Study of Cediranib in Combination with Oxaliplatin and Infusional 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1481 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |