Clinical Cancer Research Meeting Calendar AACR Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 498, January 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2734
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Reeve, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Reeve, A. E.

Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis

Multiple Gene Expression Classifiers from Different Array Platforms Predict Poor Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer

Yu-Hsin Lin1,2, Jan Friederichs6, Michael A. Black2, Jörg Mages7, Robert Rosenberg6, Parry J. Guilford1,2,5, Vicky Phillips3, Mark Thompson-Fawcett3, Nikola Kasabov8, Tumi Toro5, Arend E. Merrie9, Andre van Rij3, Han-Seung Yoon4, John L. McCall9, Jörg Rüdiger Siewert6, Bernhard Holzmann6 and Anthony E. Reeve1,2

Authors' Affiliations: 1 Cancer Genetics Laboratory and Departments of 2 Biochemistry, 3 Medical and Surgical Sciences, and 4 Pathology, University of Otago; 5 Pacific Edge Biotechnology Ltd., Centre for Innovation, Dunedin, New Zealand; 6 Department of Surgery and 7 Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; 8 Knowledge Engineering and Discovery Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology; and 9 Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Requests for reprints: Anthony E. Reeve, Cancer Genetics Laboratory and Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, 710 Cumberland Street, Dunedin, New Zealand. Phone: 64-3-479-7699; Fax: 64-3-479-7738; E-mail: a.reeve{at}otago.ac.nz.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop gene classifiers to predict colorectal cancer recurrence. We investigated whether gene classifiers derived from two tumor series using different array platforms could be independently validated by application to the alternate series of patients.

Experimental Design: Colorectal tumors from New Zealand (n = 149) and Germany (n = 55) patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. RNA was profiled using oligonucleotide printed microarrays (New Zealand samples) and Affymetrix arrays (German samples). Classifiers based on clinical data, gene expression data, and a combination of the two were produced and used to predict recurrence. The use of gene expression information was found to improve the predictive ability in both data sets. The New Zealand and German gene classifiers were cross-validated on the German and New Zealand data sets, respectively, to validate their predictive power. Survival analyses were done to evaluate the ability of the classifiers to predict patient survival.

Results: The prediction rates for the New Zealand and German gene-based classifiers were 77% and 84%, respectively. Despite significant differences in study design and technologies used, both classifiers retained prognostic power when applied to the alternate series of patients. Survival analyses showed that both classifiers gave a better stratification of patients than the traditional clinical staging. One classifier contained genes associated with cancer progression, whereas the other had a large immune response gene cluster concordant with the role of a host immune response in modulating colorectal cancer outcome.

Conclusions: The successful reciprocal validation of gene-based classifiers on different patient cohorts and technology platforms supports the power of microarray technology for individualized outcome prediction of colorectal cancer patients. Furthermore, many of the genes identified have known biological functions congruent with the predicted outcomes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. S. Garman, C. R. Acharya, E. Edelman, M. Grade, J. Gaedcke, S. Sud, W. Barry, A. M. Diehl, D. Provenzale, G. S. Ginsburg, et al.
A genomic approach to colon cancer risk stratification yields biologic insights into therapeutic opportunities
PNAS, December 9, 2008; 105(49): 19432 - 19437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
A.-L. Boulesteix, C. Porzelius, and M. Daumer
Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2008; 24(15): 1698 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. M. Schewe and J. A. Aguirre-Ghiso
ATF6{alpha}-Rheb-mTOR signaling promotes survival of dormant tumor cells in vivo
PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10519 - 10524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.