Clinical Cancer Research Bridging the Lab and the Clinic in Cancer Medicine Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Clinical Cancer Research 13, 559-565, January 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1210
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. T.

Cancer Therapy: Clinical

Cumulative Incidence in Competing Risks Data and Competing Risks Regression Analysis

Haesook T. Kim

Author's Affiliation: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Haesook T. Kim, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, M218 Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-638-6547; Fax: 617-632-2444; E-mail: kim.haesook{at}jimmy.harvard.edu.

Competing risks occur commonly in medical research. For example, both treatment-related mortality and disease recurrence are important outcomes of interest and well-known competing risks in cancer research. In the analysis of competing risks data, methods of standard survival analysis such as the Kaplan-Meier method for estimation of cumulative incidence, the log-rank test for comparison of cumulative incidence curves, and the standard Cox model for the assessment of covariates lead to incorrect and biased results. In this article, we discuss competing risks data analysis which includes methods to calculate the cumulative incidence of an event of interest in the presence of competing risks, to compare cumulative incidence curves in the presence of competing risks, and to perform competing risks regression analysis. A hypothetical numeric example and real data are used to compare those three methods in the competing risks data analysis to their respective counterparts in the standard survival analysis. The source and magnitude of bias from the Kaplan-Meier estimate is also detailed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. J. Dignam and M. N. Kocherginsky
Choice and Interpretation of Statistical Tests Used When Competing Risks Are Present
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2008; 26(24): 4027 - 4034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C.-S. Wang, S.-T. Wang, and P. Chou
THREE AUTHORS REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2008; 167(6): 751 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. E. Behrendt
RE: "HEPATITIS C VIRUS INFECTION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES IN A COMMUNITY-BASED LONGITUDINAL STUDY"
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2008; 167(6): 751 - 751.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.